-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 30/03/14 19:24, Attila Molnar wrote:
>
> In extensions/batch-3.2:
>
> > @@ -62,6 +62,11 @@ While batch types are similiar to capabilities in
this aspect, unlike
> >  capabilities, batch types are not advertised by servers nor explicitly
> >  requested by clients.
> > 
> > +Client MAY use the type to change the way how the messages are
presented to user,
>
> "the way" does not feel correct here to me and should be removed,
hopefully a native English speaker can say tell us?
>
> "Clients MAY use the type to change how the messages are presented to
the user" is what sounds ok to me
>

Either that or "Clients MAY use the type to change the way the messages
are presented to the user".

It's the use of both "the way" and "how" that's the problem with the
current wording.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=mERs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----