arm: vfpmodule: Fix warning procfs vfp_bounce reporting failed

Creation of procfs cpu/vfp_bounce fails because we're initialized too early. Fix
this by creating it on rootfs_initcall as before the NEON patches.

<6>[    0.130770] VFP support v0.3: implementor 51 architecture 64 part 6f varia
nt 2 rev 0
<4>[    0.130795] ------------[ cut here ]------------
<4>[    0.130813] WARNING: at fs/proc/generic.c:323 __xlate_proc_name+0xac/0xcc(
)
<4>[    0.130822] name 'cpu/vfp_bounce'
<4>[    0.130855] [<c010e26c>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x144) from [<c0a20f58>] (d
ump_stack+0x20/0x24)
<4>[    0.130879] [<c0a20f58>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24) from [<c019b670>] (warn_sl
owpath_common+0x58/0x70)
<4>[    0.130899] [<c019b670>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x58/0x70) from [<c019b704>
] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x48)
<4>[    0.130919] [<c019b704>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x48) from [<c02c2ad8>] (
__xlate_proc_name+0xac/0xcc)
<4>[    0.130938] [<c02c2ad8>] (__xlate_proc_name+0xac/0xcc) from [<c02c2b50>] (
__proc_create+0x58/0x100)
<4>[    0.130956] [<c02c2b50>] (__proc_create+0x58/0x100) from [<c02c2ed0>] (pro
c_create_data+0x5c/0xc0)
<4>[    0.130979] [<c02c2ed0>] (proc_create_data+0x5c/0xc0) from [<c0f03484>] (v
fp_init+0x19c/0x200)
<4>[    0.131000] [<c0f03484>] (vfp_init+0x19c/0x200) from [<c0f00c98>] (do_one_
initcall+0x98/0x168)
<4>[    0.131020] [<c0f00c98>] (do_one_initcall+0x98/0x168) from [<c0f00e60>] (k
ernel_init+0xf8/0x1b4)
<4>[    0.131043] [<c0f00e60>] (kernel_init+0xf8/0x1b4) from [<c01081a0>] (kerne
l_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)
<4>[    0.131076] ---[ end trace ea6d9a9b5e947151 ]---
<3>[    0.131086] Failed to create procfs node for VFP bounce reporting

Signed-off-by: Paul Reioux <reioux@gmail.com>
futex: Misc cleanups

Date	Thu, 2 Jan 2014 07:05:17 -0800

From: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>

- Remove unnecessary head variables.
- Delete unused parameter in queue_unlock().

Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Scott Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>
Cc: Tom Vaden <tom.vaden@hp.com>
Cc: Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>

Signed-off-by: Paul Reioux <reioux@gmail.com>
futex: Larger hash table

Date	Thu, 2 Jan 2014 07:05:18 -0800

From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>

Currently, the futex global hash table suffers from it's fixed, smallish
(for today's standards) size of 256 entries, as well as its lack of NUMA
awareness. Large systems, using many futexes, can be prone to high amounts
of collisions; where these futexes hash to the same bucket and lead to
extra contention on the same hb->lock. Furthermore, cacheline bouncing is a
reality when we have multiple hb->locks residing on the same cacheline and
different futexes hash to adjacent buckets.
This patch keeps the current static size of 16 entries for small systems,
or otherwise, 256 * ncpus (or larger as we need to round the number to a
power of 2). Note that this number of CPUs accounts for all CPUs that can
ever be available in the system, taking into consideration things like
hotpluging. While we do impose extra overhead at bootup by making the hash
table larger, this is a one time thing, and does not shadow the benefits
of this patch.

Furthermore, as suggested by tglx, by cache aligning the hash buckets we can
avoid access across cacheline boundaries and also avoid massive cache line
bouncing if multiple cpus are hammering away at different hash buckets which
happen to reside in the same cache line.

Also, similar to other core kernel components (pid, dcache, tcp), by using
alloc_large_system_hash() we benefit from its NUMA awareness and thus the
table is distributed among the nodes instead of in a single one.

For a custom microbenchmark that pounds on the uaddr hashing -- making the wait
path fail at futex_wait_setup() returning -EWOULDBLOCK for large amounts of
futexes, we can see the following benefits on a 80-core, 8-socket 1Tb server:

+---------+--------------------+------------------------+-----------------------+-------------------------------+
| threads | baseline (ops/sec) | aligned-only (ops/sec) | large table (ops/sec) | large table+aligned (ops/sec) |
+---------+--------------------+------------------------+-----------------------+-------------------------------+
|     512 |		 32426 | 50531  (+55.8%)	| 255274  (+687.2%)	| 292553  (+802.2%)		|
|     256 |		 65360 | 99588  (+52.3%)	| 443563  (+578.6%)	| 508088  (+677.3%)		|
|     128 |		125635 | 200075 (+59.2%)	| 742613  (+491.1%)	| 835452  (+564.9%)		|
|      80 |		193559 | 323425 (+67.1%)	| 1028147 (+431.1%)	| 1130304 (+483.9%)		|
|      64 |		247667 | 443740 (+79.1%)	| 997300  (+302.6%)	| 1145494 (+362.5%)		|
|      32 |		628412 | 721401 (+14.7%)	| 965996  (+53.7%)	| 1122115 (+78.5%)		|
+---------+--------------------+------------------------+-----------------------+-------------------------------+
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Scott Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>
Cc: Tom Vaden <tom.vaden@hp.com>
Cc: Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Reioux <reioux@gmail.com>

Conflicts:
	kernel/futex.c

Change-Id: I6269ebbe9bf4e970a203b545a69d9e9c22333c36

Conflicts:
	kernel/futex.c