cat-file: refactor error handling of batch_objects

This just pulls the return value for the function out of the
inner loop, so we can break out of the loop rather than do
an early return. This will make it easier to put any cleanup
for the function in one place.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
cat-file: fix a minor memory leak in batch_objects

We should always have been freeing our strbuf, but doing so
consistently was annoying until the refactoring in the
previous patch.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
wt-status.c: make cut_line[] const to shrink .data section a bit

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
wt-status.c: move cut-line print code out to wt_status_add_cut_line

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
combine-diff: move show_log_first logic/action out of paths scanning

Judging from sample outputs and tests nothing changes in diff -c output,
and this change will help later patches, when we'll be refactoring paths
scanning into its own function with several variants - the
show_log_first logic / code will stay common to all of them.

NOTE: only now we have to take care to explicitly not show anything if
    parents array is empty, as in fact there are some clients in Git code,
    which calls diff_tree_combined() in such a way.

Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
combine-diff: move changed-paths scanning logic into its own function

Move code for finding paths for which diff(commit,parent_i) is not-empty
for all parents to separate function - at present we have generic (and
slow) code for this job, which translates 1 n-parent problem to n
1-parent problems and then intersect results, and will be adding another
limited, but faster, paths scanning implementation in the next patch.

Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
tree-diff: no need to manually verify that there is no mode change for a path

Because if there is, such two tree entries would never be compared as
equal - the code in base_name_compare() explicitly compares modes, if
there is a change for dir bit, even for equal paths, entries would
compare as different.

The code I'm removing here is from 2005 April 262e82b4 (Fix diff-tree
recursion), which pre-dates base_name_compare() introduction in 958ba6c9
(Introduce "base_name_compare()" helper function) by a month.

Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
tree-diff: no need to pass match to skip_uninteresting()

It is neither used there as input, nor the output written through it, is
used outside.

Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
commit: add --cleanup=scissors

Since 1a72cfd (commit -v: strip diffs and submodule shortlogs from the
commit message - 2013-12-05) we have a less fragile way to cut out
"git status" at the end of a commit message but it's only enabled for
stripping submodule shortlogs.

Add new cleanup option that reuses the same mechanism for the entire
"git status" without accidentally removing lines starting with '#'.

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
request-pull: more strictly match local/remote branches

The current 'request-pull' will try to find matching commit on the given
remote, and rewrite the "please pull" line to match that remote ref.

That may be very helpful if your local tree doesn't match the layout of
the remote branches, but for the common case it's been a recurring
disaster, when "request-pull" is done against a delayed remote update, and
it rewrites the target branch randomly to some other branch name that
happens to have the same expected SHA1 (or more commonly, leaves it
blank).

To avoid that recurring problem, this changes "git request-pull" so that
it matches the ref name to be pulled against the *local* repository, and
then warns if the remote repository does not have that exact same branch
or tag name and content.

This means that git request-pull will never rewrite the ref-name you gave
it.  If the local branch name is "xyzzy", that is the only branch name
that request-pull will ask the other side to fetch.

If the remote has that branch under a different name, that's your problem
and git request-pull will not try to fix it up (but git request-pull will
warn about the fact that no exact matching branch is found, and you can
edit the end result to then have the remote name you want if it doesn't
match your local one).

The new "find local ref" code will also complain loudly if you give an
ambiguous refname (eg you have both a tag and a branch with that same
name, and you don't specify "heads/name" or "tags/name").

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
request-pull: allow "local:remote" to specify names on both ends

This allows a user to say that a local branch has a different name on
the remote server, using the same syntax that "git push" uses to create
that situation.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
request-pull: pick up tag message as before

The previous two steps were meant to stop updating the explicit
refname the user gave to the command to a different ref that points
at it.  Most notably, we no longer substitute a branch name the user
used with a name of the tag that points at the commit at the tip of
the branch (it still can be done with "local-branch:remote-tag").

However, they also lost the code that included the message in a
tag when the user _did_ ask the tag to be pulled.  Resurrect it.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
request-pull: test updates

This illustrates behaviour changes that result from the recent
change by Linus.  Most show good changes, but there may be some
usability regressions:

 - The command continues to fail when the user forgot to push out
   before running the command, but the wording of the message has
   been slightly changed.

 - The command no longer guesses when asked to request the commit at
   the HEAD be pulled after pushing it to a branch 'for-upstream',
   even when that branch points at the correct commit.  The user
   must ask the command with the new "master:for-upstream" syntax.

The new behaviour needs to be documented in any case, but we need to
agree what the new behaviour should be before doing so first.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
request-pull: resurrect "pretty refname" feature

When asking to fetch/pull a branch whose name is B or a tag whose
name is T, we used to show the command to run as:

	git pull $URL B
        git pull $URL tags/T

even when B and T were spelled in a more qualified way in order to
disambiguate, e.g. heads/B or refs/tags/T, but the recent update
lost this feature.  Resurrect it.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
fetch: add a failing test for prunning with overlapping refspecs

When a remote has multiple fetch refspecs and these overlap in the
target namespace, fetch may prune a remote-tracking branch which still
exists in the remote. The test uses a popular form of this, by putting
pull requests as stored in a popular hosting platform alongside "real"
remote-tracking branches.

The fetch command makes a decision of whether to prune based
on the first matching refspec, which in this case is insufficient, as it
covers the pull request names. This pair of refspecs does work as
expected if the more "specific" refspec is the first in the list.

Signed-off-by: Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
tree-diff: show_tree() is not needed

We don't need special code for showing added/removed subtree, because we
can do the same via diff_tree_sha1, just passing NULL for absent tree.

And compared to show_tree(), which was calling show_entry() for every
tree entry, that would lead to the same show_entry() callings:

    show_tree(t):
        for e in t.entries:
            show_entry(e)

    diff_tree_sha1(NULL, new):  /* the same applies to (old, NULL) */
        diff_tree(t1=NULL, t2)
            ...
            if (!t1->size)
                show_entry(t2)
            ...

and possible overhead is negligible, since after the patch, timing for

    `git log --raw --no-abbrev --no-renames`

for navy.git and `linux.git v3.10..v3.11` is practically the same.

So let's say goodbye to show_tree() - it removes some code, but also,
and what is important, consolidates more code for showing/recursing into
trees into one place.

Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
configure.ac: link with -liconv for locale_charset()

On e.g. FreeBSD 10.x, the following situation is common:
- there's iconv implementation in libc, which has no locale_charset()
  function
- there's GNU libiconv installed from Ports Collection

Git build process
- detects that iconv is in libc and thus -liconv is not needed for it
- detects locale_charset in -liconv, but for some reason doesn't add it
  to CHARSET_LIB (as it would do with -lcharset if locale_charset() was
  found there instead of -liconv)
- git doesn't build due to unresolved external locale_charset()

Fix this by adding -liconv to CHARSET_LIB if locale_charset() is
detected in this library.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
merge hook tests: fix missing '&&' in test

Signed-off-by: Benoit Pierre <benoit.pierre@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
merge hook tests: use 'test_must_fail' instead of '!'

Signed-off-by: Benoit Pierre <benoit.pierre@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
builtin/mv: fix out of bounds write

When commit a88c915 (mv: move submodules using a gitfile, 2013-07-30)
added the submodule_gitfile array, it was not added to the block that
enlarges the arrays when we are moving a directory so that we do not
have to worry about it being a directory when we perform the actual
move.  After this, the loop continues over the enlarged set of sources.

Since we assume that submodule_gitfile has size argc, if any of the
items in the source directory are submodules we are guaranteed to write
beyond the end of submodule_gitfile.

Fix this by realloc'ing submodule_gitfile at the same time as the other
arrays.

Reported-by: Guillaume Gelin <contact@ramnes.eu>
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>