You did not comprehend me, or I emitted the message in a bit wonky way, so let me repeat:

If you look at this PR, you will notice that a *Test class will _already log into it's own file having it's own class FQN as filename_. No two separate UT class will log in same file. The fact that logger is named "TEST" instead of "i.k.u.FooBarTest" serves the sole purpose to ease spotting the output of the UT class, in already class specific log file.

And finally, aside of "marking" purpose logging ("now doing this" or similar) in UTs, I see no much purpose of "dumping" the Object as JSON, as it would imply you need some "visual assertion" to happen by human reading UT logs?

Ultimately, I believe it was exactly you, who was frowned how "chatty" Nexus UT logs were, and we had an iteration of changes lessening UT log output... :kiss: