I've been looking into this, trying to determine a set of rules to apply to the document. I now have a theory as to why we're using "[bind][1]" rather than "[_.bind][1]": the underscore gets lost when underlined, and links are underlined throughout the document.

It would be silly to remove useful links to avoid a typographic challenge, so the question is whether or not to include the `_.` prefix. Prefixing is more correct, as it makes clear that we're referencing _.bind, say, rather than Function.prototype.bind. That said, linking to the relevant section of the Underscore documentation arguably serves this purpose.

My preference is to use a hyperlink wherever one section of the documentation references another, but to omit the `_.` prefix for aesthetic reasons. Does my reasoning seem sound, @michaelficarra? If so, I'll submit a pull request.


[1]: http://underscorejs.org/#bind