git cleanup..
async: Fixed an include coding style issue

Added <linux/atomic.h>,<linux/ktime.h> and Removed <asm/atomic.h>.
Added KERN_DEBUG to printk() functions.

Acked-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul McQuade <tungstentide@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4DE596B4.7030904@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
async: uninitialized warning corrections

The variables here are really not used uninitialized.

kernel/async.c: In function 'async_synchronize_cookie_domain':
kernel/async.c:270:10: warning: 'starttime.tv64' may be used uninitialized in this function
kernel/async.c: In function 'async_run_entry_fn':
kernel/async.c:122:10: warning: 'calltime.tv64' may be used uninitialized in this function

Signed-off-by: Vitaliy Ivanov <vitalivanov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
rcu: Use kthread_create_on_node()

Commit a26ac2455ffc (move TREE_RCU from softirq to kthread) added
per-CPU kthreads.  However, kthread creation uses kthread_create(), which
can put the kthread's stack and task struct on the wrong NUMA node.
Therefore, use kthread_create_on_node() instead of kthread_create()
so that the stacks and task structs are placed on the correct NUMA node.

A similar change was carried out in commit 94dcf29a11b3 (kthread:
use kthread_create_on_node()).

Also change rcutorture's priority-boost-test kthread creation.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
CC: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
CC: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
rcu: Avoid unnecessary self-wakeup of per-CPU kthreads

There are a number of cases where the RCU can find additional work
for the per-CPU kthread within the context of that per-CPU kthread.
In such cases, the per-CPU kthread is already running, so attempting
to wake itself up does nothing except waste CPU cycles.  This commit
therefore checks to see if it is in the per-CPU kthread context,
omitting the wakeup in this case.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
rcu: Restore checks for blocking in RCU read-side critical sections

Long ago, using TREE_RCU with PREEMPT would result in "scheduling
while atomic" diagnostics if you blocked in an RCU read-side critical
section.  However, PREEMPT now implies TREE_PREEMPT_RCU, which defeats
this diagnostic.  This commit therefore adds a replacement diagnostic
based on PROVE_RCU.

Because rcu_lockdep_assert() and lockdep_rcu_dereference() are now being
used for things that have nothing to do with rcu_dereference(), rename
lockdep_rcu_dereference() to lockdep_rcu_suspicious() and add a third
argument that is a string indicating what is suspicious.  This third
argument is passed in from a new third argument to rcu_lockdep_assert().
Update all calls to rcu_lockdep_assert() to add an informative third
argument.

Also, add a pair of rcu_lockdep_assert() calls from within
rcu_note_context_switch(), one complaining if a context switch occurs
in an RCU-bh read-side critical section and another complaining if a
context switch occurs in an RCU-sched read-side critical section.
These are present only if the PROVE_RCU kernel parameter is enabled.

Finally, fix some checkpatch whitespace complaints in lockdep.c.

Again, you must enable PROVE_RCU to see these new diagnostics.  But you
are enabling PROVE_RCU to check out new RCU uses in any case, aren't you?

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
rcu: Fix mismatched variable in rcutree_trace.c

rcutree.c defines rcu_cpu_kthread_cpu as int, not unsigned int,
so the extern has to follow that.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
rcu: Abstract common code for RCU grace-period-wait primitives

Pull the code that waits for an RCU grace period into a single function,
which is then called by synchronize_rcu() and friends in the case of
TREE_RCU and TREE_PREEMPT_RCU, and from rcu_barrier() and friends in
the case of TINY_RCU and TINY_PREEMPT_RCU.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
rcu: Catch rcutorture up to new RCU API additions

Now that the RCU API contains synchronize_rcu_bh(), synchronize_sched(),
call_rcu_sched(), and rcu_bh_expedited()...

Make rcutorture test synchronize_rcu_bh(), getting rid of the old
rcu_bh_torture_synchronize() workaround.  Similarly, make rcutorture test
synchronize_sched(), getting rid of the old sched_torture_synchronize()
workaround.  Make rcutorture test call_rcu_sched() instead of wrappering
synchronize_sched().  Also add testing of rcu_bh_expedited().

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Conflicts:
	Documentation/RCU/torture.txt

Change-Id: Iadb3b601edb8bc9a221d5131e59f2826a47cc1d5
rcu: Don't destroy rcu_torture_boost() callback until it is done

The rcu_torture_boost() cleanup code destroyed debug-objects state before
waiting for the last RCU callback to be invoked, resulting in rare but
very real debug-objects warnings.  Move the destruction to after the
waiting to fix this problem.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
rcu: Add event-tracing for RCU callback invocation

There was recently some controversy about the overhead of invoking RCU
callbacks.  Add TRACE_EVENT()s to obtain fine-grained timings for the
start and stop of a batch of callbacks and also for each callback invoked.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
rcu: Event-trace markers for computing RCU CPU utilization

This commit adds the trace_rcu_utilization() marker that is to be
used to allow postprocessing scripts compute RCU's CPU utilization,
give or take event-trace overhead.  Note that we do not include RCU's
dyntick-idle interface because event tracing requires RCU protection,
which is not available in dyntick-idle mode.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
rcu: Put names into TINY_RCU structures under RCU_TRACE

In order to allow event tracing to distinguish between flavors of
RCU, we need those names in the relevant RCU data structures.  TINY_RCU
has avoided them for memory-footprint reasons, so add them only if
CONFIG_RCU_TRACE=y.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
rcu: Add RCU type to callback-invocation tracing

Add a string to the rcu_batch_start() and rcu_batch_end() trace
messages that indicates the RCU type ("rcu_sched", "rcu_bh", or
"rcu_preempt").  The trace messages for the actual invocations
themselves are not marked, as it should be clear from the
rcu_batch_start() and rcu_batch_end() events before and after.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
rcu: Update comments to reflect softirqs vs. kthreads

We now have kthreads only for flavors of RCU that support boosting,
so update the now-misleading comments accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
rcu: Move RCU_BOOST declarations to allow compiler checking

Andi Kleen noticed that one of the RCU_BOOST data declarations was
out of sync with the definition.  Move the declarations so that the
compiler can do the checking in the future.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
rcu: Add event-trace markers to TREE_RCU kthreads

Add event-trace markers to TREE_RCU kthreads to allow including these
kthread's CPU time in the utilization calculations.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
rcu: Make TINY_RCU also use softirq for RCU_BOOST=n

This patch #ifdefs TINY_RCU kthreads out of the kernel unless RCU_BOOST=y,
thus eliminating context-switch overhead if RCU priority boosting has
not been configured.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
rcu: Add grace-period, quiescent-state, and call_rcu trace events

Add trace events to record grace-period start and end, quiescent states,
CPUs noticing grace-period start and end, grace-period initialization,
call_rcu() invocation, tasks blocking in RCU read-side critical sections,
tasks exiting those same critical sections, force_quiescent_state()
detection of dyntick-idle and offline CPUs, CPUs entering and leaving
dyntick-idle mode (except from NMIs), CPUs coming online and going
offline, and CPUs being kicked for staying in dyntick-idle mode for too
long (as in many weeks, even on 32-bit systems).

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

rcu: Add the rcu flavor to callback trace events

The earlier trace events for registering RCU callbacks and for invoking
them did not include the RCU flavor (rcu_bh, rcu_preempt, or rcu_sched).
This commit adds the RCU flavor to those trace events.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
rcu: Simplify quiescent-state accounting

There is often a delay between the time that a CPU passes through a
quiescent state and the time that this quiescent state is reported to the
RCU core.  It is quite possible that the grace period ended before the
quiescent state could be reported, for example, some other CPU might have
deduced that this CPU passed through dyntick-idle mode.  It is critically
important that quiescent state be counted only against the grace period
that was in effect at the time that the quiescent state was detected.

Previously, this was handled by recording the number of the last grace
period to complete when passing through a quiescent state.  The RCU
core then checks this number against the current value, and rejects
the quiescent state if there is a mismatch.  However, one additional
possibility must be accounted for, namely that the quiescent state was
recorded after the prior grace period completed but before the current
grace period started.  In this case, the RCU core must reject the
quiescent state, but the recorded number will match.  This is handled
when the CPU becomes aware of a new grace period -- at that point,
it invalidates any prior quiescent state.

This works, but is a bit indirect.  The new approach records the current
grace period, and the RCU core checks to see (1) that this is still the
current grace period and (2) that this grace period has not yet ended.
This approach simplifies reasoning about correctness, and this commit
changes over to this new approach.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>