sched: Reset rq->next_interval before going idle

next_balance, the point in jiffy time scale when a cpu will next load
balance, could have been calculated when the cpu was busy. A busy cpu
will apply its sched domain's busy_factor (usually > 1) in computing
next_balance for that sched domain, which causes the (busy) cpu to load
balance less frequently in its sched domains. However when the same cpu
is going idle, its next_balance needs to be reset without consideration
of busy_factor. Failure to do so would not trigger nohz idle balancer on
that cpu for unnecessarily long time (introducing additional scheduling
latencies for tasks). Fix bug in scheduler which aims to reset
next_balance before a cpu goes idle (as per existing comment) but is
clearly not doing so.

Change-Id: I7e027a51686528c4092d770c7d33c874d38f5df4
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@codeaurora.org>
sched: Fix SCHED_HRTICK bug leading to late preemption of tasks

SCHED_HRTICK feature is useful to preempt SCHED_FAIR tasks on-the-dot
(just when they would have exceeded their ideal_runtime). It makes use
of a a per-cpu hrtimer resource and hence alarming that hrtimer should
be based on total SCHED_FAIR tasks a cpu has across its various cfs_rqs,
rather than being based on number of tasks in a particular cfs_rq (as
implemented currently). As a result, with current code, its possible for
a running task (which is the sole task in its cfs_rq) to be preempted
much after its ideal_runtime has elapsed, resulting in increased latency
for tasks in other cfs_rq on same cpu.

Fix this by alarming sched hrtimer based on total number of SCHED_FAIR
tasks a CPU has across its various cfs_rqs.

Change-Id: I1f23680a64872f8ce0f451ac4bcae28e8967918f
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@codeaurora.org>