WLAN subsystem: Sysctl support for key TCP/IP parameters

It has been observed that default values for some of key tcp/ip
parameters are affecting the tput/performance of the system. Hence
extending configuration capabilities to TCP/Ip stack through
sysctl interface

CRs-Fixed: 507581

Change-Id: Ibaf821fcac9fba6448c5c23aef9d72946808e3cf
Signed-off-by: Kiran Kumar Lokere <klokere@codeaurora.org>
msm: Create shadow files under /sys/kernel/ipv4

The TCP delayed ack parameters can be configured from user space
application which runs with non-root credentials and does not have
direct write access to /proc entries. This commit creates shadow
files under /sys/kernel/ipv4 which maps to /proc/sys/net/ipv4.

CRs-Fixed: 628139
Change-Id: Ib7242aaae930dbc02133e44c04e182ebc52bc89f
Signed-off-by: Ravi Joshi <ravij@codeaurora.org>
Revert "mm: kmemleak: avoid false negatives on vmalloc'ed objects"

This reverts commit 47710cb104a95dda213c949424d78614e78dc091.
cgroup: notify_on_release may not be triggered in some cases

notify_on_release must be triggered when the last process in a cgroup is
move to another. But if the first(and only) process in a cgroup is moved to
another, notify_on_release is not triggered.

	# mkdir /cgroup/cpu/SRC
	# mkdir /cgroup/cpu/DST
	#
	# echo 1 >/cgroup/cpu/SRC/notify_on_release
	# echo 1 >/cgroup/cpu/DST/notify_on_release
	#
	# sleep 300 &
	[1] 8629
	#
	# echo 8629 >/cgroup/cpu/SRC/tasks
	# echo 8629 >/cgroup/cpu/DST/tasks
	-> notify_on_release for /SRC must be triggered at this point,
	   but it isn't.

This is because put_css_set() is called before setting CGRP_RELEASABLE
in cgroup_task_migrate(), and is a regression introduce by the
commit:74a1166d(cgroups: make procs file writable), which was merged
into v3.0.

Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: Ben Blum <bblum@andrew.cmu.edu>
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
Revert "cgroup: Remove task_lock() from cgroup_post_fork()"

commit d87838321124061f6c935069d97f37010fa417e6 upstream.

This reverts commit 7e3aa30ac8c904a706518b725c451bb486daaae9.

The commit incorrectly assumed that fork path always performed
threadgroup_change_begin/end() and depended on that for
synchronization against task exit and cgroup migration paths instead
of explicitly grabbing task_lock().

threadgroup_change is not locked when forking a new process (as
opposed to a new thread in the same process) and even if it were it
wouldn't be effective as different processes use different threadgroup
locks.

Revert the incorrect optimization.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <20121008020000.GB2575@localhost>
Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
Revert "cgroup: Drop task_lock(parent) on cgroup_fork()"

This reverts commit 7e381b0eb1e1a9805c37335562e8dc02e7d7848c.

The commit incorrectly assumed that fork path always performed
threadgroup_change_begin/end() and depended on that for
synchronization against task exit and cgroup migration paths instead
of explicitly grabbing task_lock().

threadgroup_change is not locked when forking a new process (as
opposed to a new thread in the same process) and even if it were it
wouldn't be effective as different processes use different threadgroup
locks.

Revert the incorrect optimization.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <20121008020000.GB2575@localhost>
Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Bitterly-Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
cgroup: remove incorrect dget/dput() pair in cgroup_create_dir()

cgroup_create_dir() does weird dancing with dentry refcnt.  On
success, it gets and then puts it achieving nothing.  On failure, it
puts but there isn't no matching get anywhere leading to the following
oops if cgroup_create_file() fails for whatever reason.

  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  kernel BUG at /work/os/work/fs/dcache.c:552!
  invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
  Modules linked in:
  CPU 2
  Pid: 697, comm: mkdir Not tainted 3.7.0-rc4-work+ #3 Bochs Bochs
  RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff811d9c0c>]  [<ffffffff811d9c0c>] dput+0x1dc/0x1e0
  RSP: 0018:ffff88001a3ebef8  EFLAGS: 00010246
  RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88000e5b1ef8 RCX: 0000000000000403
  RDX: 0000000000000303 RSI: 2000000000000000 RDI: ffff88000e5b1f58
  RBP: ffff88001a3ebf18 R08: ffffffff82c76960 R09: 0000000000000001
  R10: ffff880015022080 R11: ffd9bed70f48a041 R12: 00000000ffffffea
  R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff88000e5b1f58 R15: 00007fff57656d60
  FS:  00007ff05fcb3800(0000) GS:ffff88001fd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 00000000004046f0 CR3: 000000001315f000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
  DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
  DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
  Process mkdir (pid: 697, threadinfo ffff88001a3ea000, task ffff880015022080)
  Stack:
   ffff88001a3ebf48 00000000ffffffea 0000000000000001 0000000000000000
   ffff88001a3ebf38 ffffffff811cc889 0000000000000001 ffff88000e5b1ef8
   ffff88001a3ebf68 ffffffff811d1fc9 ffff8800198d7f18 ffff880019106ef8
  Call Trace:
   [<ffffffff811cc889>] done_path_create+0x19/0x50
   [<ffffffff811d1fc9>] sys_mkdirat+0x59/0x80
   [<ffffffff811d2009>] sys_mkdir+0x19/0x20
   [<ffffffff81be1e02>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
  Code: 00 48 8d 90 18 01 00 00 48 89 93 c0 00 00 00 4c 89 a0 18 01 00 00 48 8b 83 a0 00 00 00 83 80 28 01 00 00 01 e8 e6 6f a0 00 eb 92 <0f> 0b 66 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 89 e5 41 57 41 56 49 89 fe 41
  RIP  [<ffffffff811d9c0c>] dput+0x1dc/0x1e0
   RSP <ffff88001a3ebef8>
  ---[ end trace 1277bcfd9561ddb0 ]---

Fix it by dropping the unnecessary dget/dput() pair.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
cgroup: fix an off-by-one bug which may trigger BUG_ON()

The 3rd parameter of flex_array_prealloc() is the number of elements,
not the index of the last element.

The effect of the bug is, when opening cgroup.procs, a flex array will
be allocated and all elements of the array is allocated with
GFP_KERNEL flag, but the last one is GFP_ATOMIC, and if we fail to
allocate memory for it, it'll trigger a BUG_ON().

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
cgroup: fail if monitored file and event_control are in different cgroup

If we pass fd of memory.usage_in_bytes of cgroup A to cgroup.event_control
of cgroup B, then we won't get memory usage notification from A but B!

What's worse, if A and B are in different mount hierarchy, we'll end up
accessing NULL pointer!

Disallow this kind of invalid usage.

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Weng Meiling <wengmeiling.weng@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
cgroup: cgroup_subsys->fork() should be called after the task is added to css_set

cgroup core has a bug which violates a basic rule about event
notifications - when a new entity needs to be added, you add that to
the notification list first and then make the new entity conform to
the current state.  If done in the reverse order, an event happening
inbetween will be lost.

cgroup_subsys->fork() is invoked way before the new task is added to
the css_set.  Currently, cgroup_freezer is the only user of ->fork()
and uses it to make new tasks conform to the current state of the
freezer.  If FROZEN state is requested while fork is in progress
between cgroup_fork_callbacks() and cgroup_post_fork(), the child
could escape freezing - the cgroup isn't frozen when ->fork() is
called and the freezer couldn't see the new task on the css_set.

This patch moves cgroup_subsys->fork() invocation to
cgroup_post_fork() after the new task is added to the css_set.
cgroup_fork_callbacks() is removed.

Because now a task may be migrated during cgroup_subsys->fork(),
freezer_fork() is updated so that it adheres to the usual RCU locking
and the rather pointless comment on why locking can be different there
is removed (if it doesn't make anything simpler, why even bother?).

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
[hq: Backported to 3.4:
 - Adjust context
 - Iterate over first CGROUP_BUILTIN_SUBSYS_COUNT elements of subsys]
Signed-off-by: Qiang Huang <h.huangqiang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
cgroup: fix exit() vs rmdir() race

In cgroup_exit() put_css_set_taskexit() is called without any lock,
which might lead to accessing a freed cgroup:

thread1                           thread2
---------------------------------------------
exit()
  cgroup_exit()
    put_css_set_taskexit()
      atomic_dec(cgrp->count);
                                   rmdir();
      /* not safe !! */
      check_for_release(cgrp);

rcu_read_lock() can be used to make sure the cgroup is alive.

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>