Yes, but my theory is we don't need to do that.


On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:17 PM, jakobkroeker <notifications@github.com>wrote:

> In M2/libraries/factory/patch-546e3e4eb7aba52cab2eb659c027866693024f3c:
>
> > @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> > +--- factory/initgmp.cc	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
> > ++++ factory/initgmp.cc	2014-03-02 15:52:08.124641882 +0100
> > +@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> > ++/* emacs edit mode for this file is -*- C++ -*- */
> > ++
> > ++#define HAVE_CONFIG_H
> > ++#include <factory/factory.h>
> > ++#include <omalloc/omalloc.h>
> > ++
> > ++int initializeGMP()
>
>  We don't need to bother with putting this function in factory, because
> we call __gmp_set_memory_functions
> anyway, and it's a synonym. We don't need to call it.
>
> currently initializeGMP seems to be called
> in M2inits.c::enterM2 via initializeGMP_Cwrapper ??
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/Macaulay2/M2/pull/108/files#r10272635>
> .
>