sched: Remove get_online_cpus() usage

Testing/Modified for 3.4.y from 6acce3ef upstream.

Remove get_online_cpus() usage from the scheduler; there's 4 sites that
use it:

 - sched_init_smp(); where its completely superfluous since we're in
   'early' boot and there simply cannot be any hotplugging.

 - sched_getaffinity(); we already take a raw spinlock to protect the
   task cpus_allowed mask, this disables preemption and therefore
   also stabilizes cpu_online_mask as that's modified using
   stop_machine. However switch to active mask for symmetry with
   sched_setaffinity()/set_cpus_allowed_ptr(). We guarantee active
   mask stability by inserting sync_rcu/sched() into _cpu_down.

 - sched_setaffinity(); we don't appear to need get_online_cpus()
   either, there's two sites where hotplug appears relevant:
    * cpuset_cpus_allowed(); for the !cpuset case we use possible_mask,
      for the cpuset case we hold task_lock, which is a spinlock and
      thus for mainline disables preemption (might cause pain on RT).
    * set_cpus_allowed_ptr(); Holds all scheduler locks and thus has
      preemption properly disabled; also it already deals with hotplug
      races explicitly where it releases them.

 - reinit_sched_domains(); we shouldn't need to hotplug here. In fact,
   this has likely been the thorn in my side, causing mpdecision to
   break on sched_mc_power_savings changes.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20131011123820.GV3081@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
(Modified for 3.4.y to include sched_domains())
Signed-off-by: Luis Cruz <ljc2491@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: Dan Trifan <jimsth@gmail.com>
sched: Remove extra put_online_cpus() inside sched_setaffinity()

Commit 6acce3ef8:

	sched: Remove get_online_cpus() usage

has left one extra put_online_cpus() inside sched_setaffinity(),
remove it to fix the WARN:

   ------------[ cut here ]------------
   WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3166 at kernel/cpu.c:84 put_online_cpus+0x43/0x70()
   ...
   [<ffffffff810c3fef>] put_online_cpus+0x43/0x70 [
   [<ffffffff810efd59>] sched_setaffinity+0x7d/0x1f9 [
   ...

Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/526DD0EE.1090309@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan Trifan <jimsth@gmail.com>
sched: Fix endless sync_sched/rcu() loop inside _cpu_down()

Commit:

	sched: Remove get_online_cpus() usage

tries to do sync_sched/rcu() inside _cpu_down() but triggers:

	INFO: task swapper/0:1 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
	...
	[<ffffffff811263dc>] synchronize_rcu+0x2c/0x30
	[<ffffffff81d1bd82>] _cpu_down+0x2b2/0x340
	...

It was caused by that in the rcu boost case we rely on smpboot thread to
finish the rcu callback, which has already been parked before sync in here
and leads to the endless sync_sched/rcu().

This patch exchanges the sequence of smpboot_park_threads() and
sync_sched/rcu() to fix the bug.

Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5282EDC0.6060003@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan Trifan <jimsth@gmail.com>
ARM: smp: Wait just 1 second for other CPU to halt

Currently, the busyloop waiting for a 2nd CPU to stop takes about 4
seconds.  Adjust for the overhead of the loop by looping every 1ms
instead of 1us.

Signed-off-by: Chris Fries <C.Fries@motorola.com>
Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.pcs.mot.com/537864
SLT-Approved: Slta Waiver <sltawvr@motorola.com>
Tested-by: Jira Key <jirakey@motorola.com>
Reviewed-by: Check Patch <CHEKPACH@motorola.com>
Reviewed-by: Klocwork kwcheck <klocwork-kwcheck@sourceforge.mot.com>
Reviewed-by: Igor Kovalenko <cik009@motorola.com>
Reviewed-by: Russell Knize <rknize2@motorola.com>
Submit-Approved: Jira Key <jirakey@motorola.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Trifan <jimsth@gmail.com>
smp: Fix idle_thread_init() inline stub

idle_thread_init() does not have arguments.

Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Dan Trifan <jimsth@gmail.com>
smpboot: Remove leftover declaration

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Dan Trifan <jimsth@gmail.com>
sched: Fix double normalization of vruntime

dequeue_entity() is called when p->on_rq and sets se->on_rq = 0
which appears to guarentee that the !se->on_rq condition is met.
If the task has done set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE) without
schedule() the second condition will be met and vruntime will be
incorrectly adjusted twice.

In certain cases this can result in the task's vruntime never increasing
past the vruntime of other tasks on the CFS' run queue, starving them of
CPU time.

This patch changes switched_from_fair() to use !p->on_rq instead of
!se->on_rq.

I'm able to cause a task with a priority of 120 to starve all other
tasks with the same priority on an ARM platform running 3.2.51-rt72
PREEMPT RT by writing one character at time to a serial tty (16550 UART)
in a tight loop. I'm also able to verify making this change corrects the
problem on that platform and kernel version.

Signed-off-by: George McCollister <george.mccollister@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1392767811-28916-1-git-send-email-george.mccollister@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan Trifan <jimsth@gmail.com>
msm: bam_dmux: Use power efficient workqueues for delayed timeouts

There is no need to use a normal per-CPU workqueue for delayed power downs
as they're not timing or performance critical and waking up a core for them
would defeat some of the point.

Signed-off-by: Luis Cruz <ljc2491@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Trifan <jimsth@gmail.com>