arm: autosmp: use kHz for cpu frequency to avoid two divide operations in the code
block: row: Fix crash when adding a new field in bio struct
When adding new field to struct bio there is a crash in the removed
code lines. This issue was introduced by commit
80a8f0f87bee18283e9ca0a8966ec97ad9f084e5 "block: row-iosched idling
triggered by readahead pages"

(Partly) reverting this patch till root cause is fixed (on FS level).

Change-Id: Ie82bc806ea52a6370b57aa15455c85b2db10d0da
Signed-off-by: Tanya Brokhman <tlinder@codeaurora.org>
autogroup sched: per-uid task group for android
sched/nohz: Fix rq->cpu_load[] calculations

While investigating why the load-balancer did funny I found that the
rq->cpu_load[] tables were completely screwy.. a bit more digging
revealed that the updates that got through were missing ticks followed
by a catchup of 2 ticks.

The catchup assumes the cpu was idle during that time (since only nohz
can cause missed ticks and the machine is idle etc..) this means that
esp. the higher indices were significantly lower than they ought to
be.

The reason for this is that its not correct to compare against jiffies
on every jiffy on any other cpu than the cpu that updates jiffies.

This patch cludges around it by only doing the catch-up stuff from
nohz_idle_balance() and doing the regular stuff unconditionally from
the tick.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: pjt@google.com
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-tp4kj18xdd5aj4vvj0qg55s2@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
sched/nohz: Fix rq->cpu_load calculations some more

Follow up on commit 556061b00 ("sched/nohz: Fix rq->cpu_load[]
calculations") since while that fixed the busy case it regressed the
mostly idle case.

Add a callback from the nohz exit to also age the rq->cpu_load[]
array. This closes the hole where either there was no nohz load
balance pass during the nohz, or there was a 'significant' amount of
idle time between the last nohz balance and the nohz exit.

So we'll update unconditionally from the tick to not insert any
accidental 0 load periods while busy, and we try and catch up from
nohz idle balance and nohz exit. Both these are still prone to missing
a jiffy, but that has always been the case.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: pjt@google.com
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-kt0trz0apodbf84ucjfdbr1a@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
sched/nohz: Rewrite and fix load-avg computation -- again
sched: LOAD_FREQ (4*HZ+61) avoids loadavg Moire
LOAD_FREQ is (5*HZ+1) to avoid high load average when idle:
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2007/10/3/328568

I suggest (4*HZ+61) for a better distribution.

With some seconds based load (like SSL heartbeats)
and LOAD_FREQ at (5*HZ+1) I see Moire patterns like inverse sawtooth,
since 2 or 3 probes hit the jobs (load increases quickly),
followed by several probes missing it.

A 4.61 sec interval gives optimal distribution over when within a
second a probe is taken, as .61 is close to golden ratio phi 1.618...
(test in http://ripke.com/goldenratio.c).

12*4.61 = 55.32 secs is still close to a minute,
and 13*4.61=59.93 is even closer than the current 12*5.01=60.12
(with exponents EXP_x adjusted to a ratio of 13 instead of 12).

Thanks to Klaus Ripke http://ripke.com/loadavg/moire
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/12/39
msm: hotplug: remove code related to cpu_killed
sched: Reset rq->next_interval before going idle

next_balance, the point in jiffy time scale when a cpu will next load
balance, could have been calculated when the cpu was busy. A busy cpu
will apply its sched domain's busy_factor (usually > 1) in computing
next_balance for that sched domain, which causes the (busy) cpu to load
balance less frequently in its sched domains. However when the same cpu
is going idle, its next_balance needs to be reset without consideration
of busy_factor. Failure to do so would not trigger nohz idle balancer on
that cpu for unnecessarily long time (introducing additional scheduling
latencies for tasks). Fix bug in scheduler which aims to reset
next_balance before a cpu goes idle (as per existing comment) but is
clearly not doing so.

Change-Id: I7e027a51686528c4092d770c7d33c874d38f5df4
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@codeaurora.org>
sched: Fix SCHED_HRTICK bug leading to late preemption of tasks

SCHED_HRTICK feature is useful to preempt SCHED_FAIR tasks on-the-dot
(just when they would have exceeded their ideal_runtime). It makes use
of a a per-cpu hrtimer resource and hence alarming that hrtimer should
be based on total SCHED_FAIR tasks a cpu has across its various cfs_rqs,
rather than being based on number of tasks in a particular cfs_rq (as
implemented currently). As a result, with current code, its possible for
a running task (which is the sole task in its cfs_rq) to be preempted
much after its ideal_runtime has elapsed, resulting in increased latency
for tasks in other cfs_rq on same cpu.

Fix this by alarming sched hrtimer based on total number of SCHED_FAIR
tasks a CPU has across its various cfs_rqs.

Change-Id: I1f23680a64872f8ce0f451ac4bcae28e8967918f
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@codeaurora.org>
sched: Mark schedule_io_timeout() with EXPORT_SYMBOL

Make schedule_io_timeout() visible to modules.

Change-Id: Ic0dedbad8a591a9a721f0d2e8f6c372ec75bc4b2
Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>
sched: fix reference to wrong cfs_rq

Commit 7db16c8c (sched: Fix SCHED_HRTICK bug leading to late preemption
of tasks) introduced a bug in sched_slice() calculation by using wrong
cfs_rq for tasks. rq->cfs was incorrectly used as task's cfs_rq, rather
than the correct one to which they belonged.

Fix the bug by using correct cfs_rq for tasks.

Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@codeaurora.org>
sched: re-calculate a cpu's next_balance point upon sched domain changes

Commit 55ddeb0f (sched: Reset rq->next_interval before going idle) reset
a cpu's rq->next_balance when pulled_task = 0, which will be true when
the cpu failed to pull any task, causing it go idle. However that patch
relied on next_balance being calculated as a result of traversing cpu's
sched domain hierarchy.

A cpu that is the only online cpu will however not be attached to any
sched domain hierarchy. When such a cpu calls into idle_balance(), we
will end up initializing next_balance to be 1sec away! Such a CPU will
defer load balance check for another 1sec, even though we may bring up
more cpus in the meantime requiring it to check for load imbalance more
frequently. This could then lead to increased scheduling latency for
some tasks.

This patch results in a cpu's next_balance being re-calculated when its
attaching to a new sched domain hierarchy.  This should let cpus call
load balance checks at the right time we expect them to!

Change-Id: I855cff8da5ca28d278596c3bb0163b839d4704bc
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@codeaurora.org>
sched: Make sure to not re-read variables after validation

We could re-read rq->rt_avg after we validated it was smaller than
total, invalidating the check and resulting in an unintended negative.

Change-Id: I8543974aad539107768e9e513ca3a8c4cb79b2ff
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1337688268.9698.29.camel@twins
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CRs-Fixed: 497236
Git-commit: b654f7de41b0e3903ee2b51d3b8db77fe52ce728
Git-repo: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@codeaurora.org>
sched: Unthrottle rt runqueues in __disable_runtime()

migrate_tasks() uses _pick_next_task_rt() to get tasks from the
real-time runqueues to be migrated. When rt_rq is throttled
_pick_next_task_rt() won't return anything, in which case
migrate_tasks() can't move all threads over and gets stuck in an
infinite loop.

Instead unthrottle rt runqueues before migrating tasks.

Additionally: move unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs() to rq_offline_fair()

Change-Id: If8a4a399f1a14b7f4789c1b205dcfadbde555214
Signed-off-by: Peter Boonstoppel <pboonstoppel@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5FBF8E85CA34454794F0F7ECBA79798F379D3648B7@HQMAIL04.nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Git-commit: a4c96ae319b8047f62dedbe1eac79e321c185749
Git-repo: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
Signed-off-by: Syed Rameez Mustafa <rameezmustafa@codeaurora.org>
sched: Convert BUG_ON()s in try_to_wake_up_local() to WARN_ON_ONCE()s

try_to_wake_up_local() should only be invoked to wake up another
task in the same runqueue and BUG_ON()s are used to enforce the
rule. Missing try_to_wake_up_local() can stall workqueue
execution but such stalls are likely to be finite either by
another work item being queued or the one blocked getting
unblocked.  There's no reason to trigger BUG while holding rq
lock crashing the whole system.

Convert BUG_ON()s in try_to_wake_up_local() to WARN_ON_ONCE()s.

Change-Id: I75fdaaf4dcaefcf3893e0404d98c8aa91f89934d
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130318192234.GD3042@htj.dyndns.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Git-repo: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
Git-commit: 383efcd00053ec40023010ce5034bd702e7ab373
CRs-Fixed: 519942
Signed-off-by: Steve Muckle <smuckle@codeaurora.org>
sched: change WARN_ON_ONCE to WARN_ON in try_to_wake_up_local()

The WARN_ON_ONCE() calls at the beginning of try_to_wake_up_local()
were recently converted from BUG_ON() calls. If these hit it indicates
something is wrong and that may contribute to other system instability.
To eliminate the risk of an instance of one of these errors going
un-noticed because there was an earlier instance that occured long ago,
change to WARN_ON(). If there ever is a flood of these there are bigger
problems.

Change-Id: I392832e2b6ec24b3569b001b1af9ecd4ed6828e7
Signed-off-by: Steve Muckle <smuckle@codeaurora.org>
sched: Fix clear NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK

I have faced a sequence where the Idle Load Balance was sometime not
triggered for a while on my platform, in the following scenario:

 CPU 0 and CPU 1 are running tasks and CPU 2 is idle

 CPU 1 kicks the Idle Load Balance
 CPU 1 selects CPU 2 as the new Idle Load Balancer
 CPU 2 sets NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK for CPU 2
 CPU 2 sends a reschedule IPI to CPU 2

 While CPU 3 wakes up, CPU 0 or CPU 1 migrates a waking up task A on CPU 2

 CPU 2 finally wakes up, runs task A and discards the Idle Load Balance
       task A quickly goes back to sleep (before a tick occurs on CPU 2)
 CPU 2 goes back to idle with NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK set

Whenever CPU 2 will be selected as the ILB, no reschedule IPI will be sent
because NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK is already set and no Idle Load Balance will be
performed.

We must wait for the sched softirq to be raised on CPU 2 thanks to another
part the kernel to come back to clear NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK.

The proposed solution clears NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK in schedule_ipi if
we can't raise the sched_softirq for the Idle Load Balance.

Change since V1:

- move the clear of NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK in got_nohz_idle_kick if the ILB
  can't run on this CPU (as suggested by Peter)

Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1370419991-13870-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Git-commit: 873b4c65b519fd769940eb281f77848227d4e5c1
Git-repo: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
[smuckle@codeaurora.org: minor merge resolution for 3.4 in scheduler_ipi()]
Signed-off-by: Steve Muckle <smuckle@codeaurora.org>
Change-Id: I3548612057cccc2ecc29429c129c44183083831f
sched: Fix nohz_idle_balance()

On tickless systems, one CPU runs load balance for all idle CPUs.

The cpu_load of this CPU is updated before starting the load balance
of each other idle CPUs. We should instead update the cpu_load of
the balance_cpu.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1347509486-8688-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
sched/nohz: Clean up select_nohz_load_balancer()

There is no load_balancer to be selected now. It just sets the
state of the nohz tick to stop.

So rename the function, pass the 'cpu' as a parameter and then
remove the useless call from tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick().

[ s/set_nohz_tick_stopped/nohz_balance_enter_idle/g
  s/clear_nohz_tick_stopped/nohz_balance_exit_idle/g ]
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1347261059-24747-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>