ARM: 7493/1: use generic unaligned.h

This moves ARM over to the asm-generic/unaligned.h header. This has the
benefit of better code generated especially for ARMv7 on gcc 4.7+
compilers.

As Arnd Bergmann, points out: The asm-generic version uses the "struct"
version for native-endian unaligned access and the "byteshift" version
for the opposite endianess. The current ARM version however uses the
"byteshift" implementation for both.

Thanks to Nicolas Pitre for the excellent analysis:

Test case:

int foo (int *x) { return get_unaligned(x); }
long long bar (long long *x) { return get_unaligned(x); }

With the current ARM version:

foo:
	ldrb	r3, [r0, #2]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 2B], MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 2B]
	ldrb	r1, [r0, #1]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 1B], MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 1B]
	ldrb	r2, [r0, #0]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D)], MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D)]
	mov	r3, r3, asl #16	@ tmp154, MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 2B],
	ldrb	r0, [r0, #3]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 3B], MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 3B]
	orr	r3, r3, r1, asl #8	@, tmp155, tmp154, MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 1B],
	orr	r3, r3, r2	@ tmp157, tmp155, MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D)]
	orr	r0, r3, r0, asl #24	@,, tmp157, MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 3B],
	bx	lr	@

bar:
	stmfd	sp!, {r4, r5, r6, r7}	@,
	mov	r2, #0	@ tmp184,
	ldrb	r5, [r0, #6]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 6B], MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 6B]
	ldrb	r4, [r0, #5]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 5B], MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 5B]
	ldrb	ip, [r0, #2]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 2B], MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 2B]
	ldrb	r1, [r0, #4]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 4B], MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 4B]
	mov	r5, r5, asl #16	@ tmp175, MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 6B],
	ldrb	r7, [r0, #1]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 1B], MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 1B]
	orr	r5, r5, r4, asl #8	@, tmp176, tmp175, MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 5B],
	ldrb	r6, [r0, #7]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 7B], MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 7B]
	orr	r5, r5, r1	@ tmp178, tmp176, MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 4B]
	ldrb	r4, [r0, #0]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D)], MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D)]
	mov	ip, ip, asl #16	@ tmp188, MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 2B],
	ldrb	r1, [r0, #3]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 3B], MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 3B]
	orr	ip, ip, r7, asl #8	@, tmp189, tmp188, MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 1B],
	orr	r3, r5, r6, asl #24	@,, tmp178, MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 7B],
	orr	ip, ip, r4	@ tmp191, tmp189, MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D)]
	orr	ip, ip, r1, asl #24	@, tmp194, tmp191, MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 3B],
	mov	r1, r3	@,
	orr	r0, r2, ip	@ tmp171, tmp184, tmp194
	ldmfd	sp!, {r4, r5, r6, r7}
	bx	lr

In both cases the code is slightly suboptimal.  One may wonder why
wasting r2 with the constant 0 in the second case for example.  And all
the mov's could be folded in subsequent orr's, etc.

Now with the asm-generic version:

foo:
	ldr	r0, [r0, #0]	@ unaligned	@,* x
	bx	lr	@

bar:
	mov	r3, r0	@ x, x
	ldr	r0, [r0, #0]	@ unaligned	@,* x
	ldr	r1, [r3, #4]	@ unaligned	@,
	bx	lr	@

This is way better of course, but only because this was compiled for
ARMv7. In this case the compiler knows that the hardware can do
unaligned word access.  This isn't that obvious for foo(), but if we
remove the get_unaligned() from bar as follows:

long long bar (long long *x) {return *x; }

then the resulting code is:

bar:
	ldmia	r0, {r0, r1}	@ x,,
	bx	lr	@

So this proves that the presumed aligned vs unaligned cases does have
influence on the instructions the compiler may use and that the above
unaligned code results are not just an accident.

Still... this isn't fully conclusive without at least looking at the
resulting assembly fron a pre ARMv6 compilation.  Let's see with an
ARMv5 target:

foo:
	ldrb	r3, [r0, #0]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ tmp139,* x
	ldrb	r1, [r0, #1]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ tmp140,
	ldrb	r2, [r0, #2]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ tmp143,
	ldrb	r0, [r0, #3]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ tmp146,
	orr	r3, r3, r1, asl #8	@, tmp142, tmp139, tmp140,
	orr	r3, r3, r2, asl #16	@, tmp145, tmp142, tmp143,
	orr	r0, r3, r0, asl #24	@,, tmp145, tmp146,
	bx	lr	@

bar:
	stmfd	sp!, {r4, r5, r6, r7}	@,
	ldrb	r2, [r0, #0]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ tmp139,* x
	ldrb	r7, [r0, #1]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ tmp140,
	ldrb	r3, [r0, #4]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ tmp149,
	ldrb	r6, [r0, #5]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ tmp150,
	ldrb	r5, [r0, #2]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ tmp143,
	ldrb	r4, [r0, #6]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ tmp153,
	ldrb	r1, [r0, #7]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ tmp156,
	ldrb	ip, [r0, #3]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ tmp146,
	orr	r2, r2, r7, asl #8	@, tmp142, tmp139, tmp140,
	orr	r3, r3, r6, asl #8	@, tmp152, tmp149, tmp150,
	orr	r2, r2, r5, asl #16	@, tmp145, tmp142, tmp143,
	orr	r3, r3, r4, asl #16	@, tmp155, tmp152, tmp153,
	orr	r0, r2, ip, asl #24	@,, tmp145, tmp146,
	orr	r1, r3, r1, asl #24	@,, tmp155, tmp156,
	ldmfd	sp!, {r4, r5, r6, r7}
	bx	lr

Compared to the initial results, this is really nicely optimized and I
couldn't do much better if I were to hand code it myself.

Change-Id: I91ea5a5e83de4bbdbb53883fe0dbf00719a8e382
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
mmc: print an error on FLUSH timeout

Up until now the FLUSH timeout error was not printed and there
was no way to know if the FLUSH completed successfully or not.
Printing the FLUSH failure will help to identify if FS corruption
happened due to this timeout.

Change-Id: Ibbb51d030d7130d63974a1b4319ad4a24621c595
Signed-off-by: Maya Erez <merez@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Dorfman <kdorfman@codeaurora.org>
mmc: block: flush request requeue after timeout.

On some eMMC cards cache flush is taking longer than 30 sec timeout
after HPI issued and -EIO reported to the upper layers. This may result
into journaling issues as flush calls are issued by the file system
joulrnaling code.

This change increases flash cache timeout to 90 sec, in case of timeout
occurs, after HPI issued, flash request re-queued to the block layer queue
to execute it later and keep journaling logic valid.

Conflicts:
	drivers/mmc/card/block.c

Change-Id: I1e968c07056062fd9c8e14e5bc3e62b3b4b99c64
Signed-off-by: Panwar Vivek <vpanwa@codeaurora.org>

Conflicts:

	drivers/mmc/card/block.c

Signed-off-by: Maya Erez <merez@codeaurora.org>
mmc: core: increase timeout for disable cache operation

According to eMMC specification, there is no upper bound defined on
a flush request and the duration of flush operation is left to card
vendor's implementation. This means that it may take a very long
time to complete.

When eMMC cache is disabled, the card has to flush all the data in its
cache. So this means that for certain cards, the driver is not waiting
long enough for the flush to complete during cache disable operation,
leading to data on the card being corrupted.

This change increases the timeout for cache disable operation, thus
preventing data corruption.

CRs-Fixed: 562350
Change-Id: If68328ab56b50c7596800f07ef92c0ab16a55ec0
Signed-off-by: Maya Erez <merez@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: David Ng <dave@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Krishna Konda <kkonda@codeaurora.org>
mmc: fix read latency of urgent request

In order to improve read request latency, urgent notification allowed
anytime, when current or previous requests are existing in the mmc layer.
It is not allowed to stop following running requests:
- urgent request: block layer should serialize urgent request notification.
- read request: it can't be packed, therefore it is better
to wait for its completion.
- REQ_FUA: interruption and delay in such request will impact sync process
of upper layers.

Change-Id: Id7d1480cce2059c1f23a5f29ad8f74e858be1ee6
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Dorfman <kdorfman@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Maya Erez <merez@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Tatyana Brokhman <tlinder@codeaurora.org>
mmc: core: do not reinsert prepeared FUA and FLUSH requests in stop flow

When mmc context has unblocked from waiting current request because of
urgent request notification coming from block layer, there is prepeared
request.  In the case, when the request is REQ_FUA or REQ_FLUSH, the
flow should not reinsert it back to i/o scheduler (since according to
block layer logic flush requests with data should never enter elevator).
Instead this request starts immediately.

Change-Id: Ia78b56c6135dd1a8d75a98fd5b771a5035e5c360
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Dorfman <kdorfman@codeaurora.org>
mmc: queue: do not clean current request when urgent in progress

As a result of following fix: "mmc: core: do not reinsert prepeared
FUA and FLUSH requests in stop flow" REQ_FUA and REQ_FLUSH requests
are not reinserted back into i/o scheduler, but instead started request
execution.

This change will prevent cleaning current request pointer for such
requests.

Change-Id: I25f8706954fb538be62182c87d5fb20354696b7a
CRs-fixed: 600127
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Dorfman <kdorfman@codeaurora.org>
mmc: core: fix block request queue hang during data crc errors

When data CRC errors occur during write transactions, mmc
block layer queries the card for successful writes. If the card
reports bytes requested as bytes successfully written, the mmc
block layer will end the request with blk_end_request(). If there
is a following async request pending for execution, the request
is thrown away while handling CRC errors leading to hang in
request queue. The hang is visible when user issues a sync()
system call.

The sequence of events are as follows -

mmcqd -> fetch a request -> send it to host driver -> fetch another
request -> wait for previous request to complete -> previous request
is in error -> skip sending current request to host driver and
do error handling for previous request in error.

During the last step, after error handling is completed the mmc
block layer does not requeue the current request which is skipped
and hence the request is infinitely stuck in the driver.

Change-Id: I9528fbe3ccb5b723fcd0793f86cca43906c4c29c
Signed-off-by: Sujit Reddy Thumma <sthumma@codeaurora.org>
mmc: core: continue to wait, when unblocked by signal

Mmc thread is waiting for one of following events occurs:
- current running request completion (is_done_rcv)
- new request notification arrived (is_new_req)
- urgent request notification arrived (is_urgent)
or the thread received a signal. In this case none of described events
happened.

This change process the case, when mmc thread was unblocked from wait by
signal, for example system shutdown flow.

Change-Id: I0b4f0cefedc839640c162ad3cdb011d13daaee0c
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Dorfman <kdorfman@codeaurora.org>