Idfxt

This pull request is for the sake of conversation, not necessarily with the intent to merge.  yet. 
agreed. in fact, developing a similar document for idfxt might be an
optimal way to produce the specification of the api.

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Dan Macumber <notifications@github.com>
wrote:
>
> In third_party/cJSON/README
> <https://github.com/NREL/EnergyPlus/pull/4636#discussion-diff-22051547>:
>
> > +  copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
> > +  furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
> > +
> > +  The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
> > +  all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
> > +
> > +  THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
> > +  IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
> > +  FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
> > +  AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
> > +  LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
> > +  OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
> > +  THE SOFTWARE.
> > +*/
> > +
> > +Welcome to cJSON.
>
> @refaqtor <https://github.com/refaqtor> something like this for idfxt
> would be great
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/NREL/EnergyPlus/pull/4636/files#r22051547>.
>