Removed asserts preventing fast re-recoes a la ECALELF

The removal of asserts should not hurt, but prevents fast re-recoes 
@lgray and cms-phys-conveners-EGM should probably double check ad approve

If I receive the green light I can do another pull request removing the lines.

-- 
 							Shervin


On Sun, 23 Nov 2014, StoyanStoynev wrote:

> Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 02:00:00 -0800
> From: StoyanStoynev <notifications@github.com>
> Reply-To: cms-sw/cmssw
>     <reply+0045c225c004a1e368e80fd5885cca6f92c6443a95aab3cc92cf000000011089722
>     092a170ce013cd2ca@reply.github.com>
> To: cms-sw/cmssw <cmssw@noreply.github.com>
> Cc: shervin86 <shervin@cern.ch>
> Subject: Re: [cmssw] Removed asserts preventing fast re-recoes a la ECALELF
>     (#6556)
> 
>> @@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ GsfElectron::GsfElectron
>>    setVertex(math::XYZPoint(te.positionAtVtx.x(),te.positionAtVtx.y(),te.positionAtVtx.z())) ;
>>    setPdgId(-11*charge) ;
>>    /*if (ecalDrivenSeed())*/ corrections_.correctedEcalEnergy = superCluster()->energy() ;
>> -  assert(ctfInfo.ctfTrack==(GsfElectron::core()->ctfTrack())) ;
>> -  assert(ctfInfo.shFracInnerHits==(GsfElectron::core()->ctfGsfOverlap())) ;
>> +  //  assert(ctfInfo.ctfTrack==(GsfElectron::core()->ctfTrack())) ;
>> +  //  assert(ctfInfo.shFracInnerHits==(GsfElectron::core()->ctfGsfOverlap())) ;
>
> You should really "remove" them if this is the decision, not commenting them out.
>
> ---
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/pull/6556/files#r20763338