msm: Improve qpnp-vibrator scheduling

 * Skip the workqueue and use spinlocks to improve interactivity
 * This vastly improves "recent apps" in Android

Change-Id: I77da17b4f1ce2f213772c41ddbac21250432279e
Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
ARM: add cpufreq transiton notifier to adjust loops_per_jiffy for smp

If CONFIG_SMP, cpufreq skips loops_per_jiffy update, because different
arch has different per-cpu loops_per_jiffy definition.

Change-Id: I3bfdf800784c9c494f873de096e3a1972f14f358
Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
ARM: 7653/2: do not scale loops_per_jiffy when using a constant delay clock

When udelay() is implemented using an architected timer, it is wrong
to scale loops_per_jiffy when changing the CPU clock frequency since
the timer clock remains constant.

The lpj should probably become an implementation detail relevant to
the CPU loop based delay routine only and more confined to it. In the
mean time this is the minimal fix needed to have expected delays with
the timer based implementation when cpufreq is also in use.

Change-Id: I75f66afe0cd4851031c71c1ebd522b402bb0a788
Reported-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
ARM: 7685/1: delay: use private ticks_per_jiffy field for timer-based delay ops

Commit 70264367a243 ("ARM: 7653/2: do not scale loops_per_jiffy when
using a constant delay clock") fixed a problem with our timer-based
delay loop, where loops_per_jiffy is scaled by cpufreq yet used directly
by the timer delay ops.

This patch fixes the problem in a more elegant way by keeping a private
ticks_per_jiffy field in the delay ops, independent of loops_per_jiffy
and therefore not subject to scaling. The loop-based delay continues to
use loops_per_jiffy directly, as it should.

Change-Id: I675a5089c2156c01e7c2e151c7be2795cf965091
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>