Yes, I saw that `fail_if_no_peer_cet` is also used by ssl app, but I was driven by the idea that config options should be more user friendly (no matter how they are related with internals) (whenever it's possible). `Fail` word sounds scary: no one wanted to let their server (note, that there is no mention about connection - so we assume the worst) to fail because of something, so in fact this option name generates negative emotions and will mostly remains untouched. The `require_peer_cert` sounds more..."secure", since we don't fail, but we raising requirements for our clients - that's more solid and user friendly.

Anyway, so my loud thoughts (: