userstudy-analysis: drop double %% sign

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
userstudy-analysis: permutate through the various methods properly

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
userstudy-analysis: only consider xml files for analysis

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
userstudy-analysis: print some user information

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
userstudy-analysis: allow target_size None for SetResults for comparison

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
userstudy: print a question ID

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
userstudy: print the method IDs for first/second method

Really hard to get to this data otherwise...

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
userstudy-analysis: print questionnaire analysis

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
userstudy-analysis: print which method is faster/better, etc.

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
userstudy-analysis: drop the catchall exception handler

Not usefull...

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
userstudy-analysis: add one-way ANOVA and stderr calculations

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Add a linear pointer acceleration method

Mostly linear anyway.

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
userstudy: up the number of training targets

5 is not enough to get used to the new accel method, so the first couple of
runs may be distorted

Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>