lib/int_sqrt.c: optimize square root algorithm

Optimize the current version of the shift-and-subtract (hardware)
algorithm, described by John von Newmann[1] and Guy L Steele.

Iterating 1,000,000 times, perf shows for the current version:

 Performance counter stats for './sqrt-curr' (10 runs):

         27.170996 task-clock                #    0.979 CPUs utilized            ( +-  3.19% )
                 3 context-switches          #    0.103 K/sec                    ( +-  4.76% )
                 0 cpu-migrations            #    0.004 K/sec                    ( +-100.00% )
               104 page-faults               #    0.004 M/sec                    ( +-  0.16% )
        64,921,199 cycles                    #    2.389 GHz                      ( +-  0.03% )
        28,967,789 stalled-cycles-frontend   #   44.62% frontend cycles idle     ( +-  0.18% )
   <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend
       104,502,623 instructions              #    1.61  insns per cycle
                                             #    0.28  stalled cycles per insn  ( +-  0.00% )
        34,088,368 branches                  # 1254.587 M/sec                    ( +-  0.00% )
             4,901 branch-misses             #    0.01% of all branches          ( +-  1.32% )

       0.027763015 seconds time elapsed                                          ( +-  3.22% )

And for the new version:

Performance counter stats for './sqrt-new' (10 runs):

          0.496869 task-clock                #    0.519 CPUs utilized            ( +-  2.38% )
                 0 context-switches          #    0.000 K/sec
                 0 cpu-migrations            #    0.403 K/sec                    ( +-100.00% )
               104 page-faults               #    0.209 M/sec                    ( +-  0.15% )
           590,760 cycles                    #    1.189 GHz                      ( +-  2.35% )
           395,053 stalled-cycles-frontend   #   66.87% frontend cycles idle     ( +-  3.67% )
   <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend
           398,963 instructions              #    0.68  insns per cycle
                                             #    0.99  stalled cycles per insn  ( +-  0.39% )
            70,228 branches                  #  141.341 M/sec                    ( +-  0.36% )
             3,364 branch-misses             #    4.79% of all branches          ( +-  5.45% )

       0.000957440 seconds time elapsed                                          ( +-  2.42% )

Furthermore, this saves space in instruction text:

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
    111       0       0     111      6f lib/int_sqrt-baseline.o
     89       0       0      89      59 lib/int_sqrt.o

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Draft_of_a_Report_on_the_EDVAC

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Gonzalez <jgonzlez@linets.cl>
Tested-by: Jonathan Gonzalez <jgonzlez@linets.cl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
int_sqrt.c: Correction square root algo with naming
int_sqrt: Improve 3x faster integer sqrt.

Result on 10,000,000 call.
Old:
sqrt(12345689) = 3513
real	0m0.768s
user	0m0.760s
sys	0m0.004s

New:
sqrt(12345689) = 3513
real	0m0.222s
user	0m0.224s
sys	0m0.000s
msm: memutils: memcpy, memmove, copy_page optimization

Preload farther to take advantage of the memory bus, and assume
64-byte cache lines.  Unroll some pairs of ldm/stm as well, for
unexplainable reasons.

Future enhancements should include,

- #define for how far to preload, possibly defined separately for
  memcpy, copy_*_user
- Tuning for misaligned buffers
- Tuning for memmove
- Tuning for small buffers
- Understanding mechanism behind ldm/stm unroll causing some gains
  in copy_to_user

BASELINE (msm8960pro):
======================================================================
memcpy 1000MB at 5MB       : took 808850 usec, bandwidth 1236.236 MB/s
copy_to_user 1000MB at 5MB : took 810071 usec, bandwidth 1234.234 MB/s
copy_from_user 1000MB at 5M: took 942926 usec, bandwidth 1060.060 MB/s
memmove 1000GB at 5MB      : took 848588 usec, bandwidth 1178.178 MB/s
copy_to_user 1000GB at 4kB : took 847916 usec, bandwidth 1179.179 MB/s
copy_from_user 1000GB at 4k: took 935113 usec, bandwidth 1069.069 MB/s
copy_page 1000GB at 4kB    : took 779459 usec, bandwidth 1282.282 MB/s

THIS PATCH:
======================================================================
memcpy 1000MB at 5MB       : took 346223 usec, bandwidth 2888.888 MB/s
copy_to_user 1000MB at 5MB : took 348084 usec, bandwidth 2872.872 MB/s
copy_from_user 1000MB at 5M: took 348176 usec, bandwidth 2872.872 MB/s
memmove 1000GB at 5MB      : took 348267 usec, bandwidth 2871.871 MB/s
copy_to_user 1000GB at 4kB : took 377018 usec, bandwidth 2652.652 MB/s
copy_from_user 1000GB at 4k: took 371829 usec, bandwidth 2689.689 MB/s
copy_page 1000GB at 4kB    : took 383763 usec, bandwidth 2605.605 MB/s

Change-Id: I843fe77192d61ce35a81e75d76fc09f0a472e98a
Signed-off-by: Chris Fries <C.Fries@motorola.com>

Conflicts:
	arch/arm/lib/Makefile
	arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig
	arch/arm/mach-msm/Makefile
msm: memutils: memcpy, memmove optimization

1. To fit 8x26 64-bytes cache line size, we change preload steps as 64Bytes.
2. According to tune result, change preload distance as 5 cache lines.
3. According to tune result, re-arrange the ld/str order as back-to-back
   for copy_from_user.

The markable improvement:
	memcpy : 5%
	copy_to_user : 9%
	copy_from_user : 13%
	memmove : 37%

Raw data is as below:

BASELINE:
	memcpy 1000MB at 5MB       : took 1547098 usec, bandwidth 646.646 MB/s
	copy_to_user 1000MB at 5MB : took 1704308 usec, bandwidth 586.586 MB/s
	copy_from_user 1000MB at 5M: took 1777090 usec, bandwidth 562.562 MB/s
	memmove 1000GB at 5MB      : took 1066205 usec, bandwidth 937.937 MB/s
	copy_to_user 1000GB at 4kB : took 1774866 usec, bandwidth 563.563 MB/s
	copy_from_user 1000GB at 4k: took 1797654 usec, bandwidth 556.556 MB/s
	copy_page 1000GB at 4kB    : took 1644606 usec, bandwidth 608.608 MB/s
	memmove 1000GB at 4kB      : took 1236227 usec, bandwidth 808.808 MB/s

THIS PATCH:
	memcpy 1000MB at 5MB       : took 1475835 usec, bandwidth 677.677 MB/s
	copy_to_user 1000MB at 5MB : took 1559060 usec, bandwidth 641.641 MB/s
	copy_from_user 1000MB at 5M: took 1561603 usec, bandwidth 640.640 MB/s
	memmove 1000GB at 5MB      : took 861664 usec, bandwidth 1160.160 MB/s
	copy_to_user 1000GB at 4kB : took 1673501 usec, bandwidth 597.597 MB/s
	copy_from_user 1000GB at 4k: took 1674006 usec, bandwidth 597.597 MB/s
	copy_page 1000GB at 4kB    : took 1691358 usec, bandwidth 591.591 MB/s
	memmove 1000GB at 4kB      : took 882985 usec, bandwidth 1132.132 MB/s

Change-Id: I83bec3b7a9dd9cd88890eaa7ec423363e230a651
Signed-off-by: Hong-Mei Li <a21834@motorola.com>
Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.pcs.mot.com/550383
SLT-Approved: Slta Waiver <sltawvr@motorola.com>
Tested-by: Jira Key <jirakey@motorola.com>
Reviewed-by: Klocwork kwcheck <klocwork-kwcheck@sourceforge.mot.com>
Reviewed-by: Check Patch <CHEKPACH@motorola.com>
Reviewed-by: Yi-Wei Zhao <gbjc64@motorola.com>
Submit-Approved: Jira Key <jirakey@motorola.com>
msm: memutils: memcpy, memmove Fix makefile issue

Conflicts:
	arch/arm/lib/Makefile
ARM: smp: Wait just 1 second for other CPU to halt

Currently, the busyloop waiting for a 2nd CPU to stop takes about 4
seconds.  Adjust for the overhead of the loop by looping every 1ms
instead of 1us.

Signed-off-by: Chris Fries <C.Fries@motorola.com>
Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.pcs.mot.com/537864
SLT-Approved: Slta Waiver <sltawvr@motorola.com>
Tested-by: Jira Key <jirakey@motorola.com>
Reviewed-by: Check Patch <CHEKPACH@motorola.com>
Reviewed-by: Klocwork kwcheck <klocwork-kwcheck@sourceforge.mot.com>
Reviewed-by: Igor Kovalenko <cik009@motorola.com>
Reviewed-by: Russell Knize <rknize2@motorola.com>
Submit-Approved: Jira Key <jirakey@motorola.com>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>