cpufreq: interactive: Modifying sync_freq implementation

1. Check for up_threshold_any_cpu_freq instead of sync_freq to
   boost the frequency to sync_freq.
2. Change the load threshold name from sync_freq_load_threshold to
   up_threshold_any_cpu_load
3. Do not consider CPUs with load less than up_threshold_any_cpu_load
   while evaluating max load across CPUs

Change-Id: Ia0e537edbf38a5006c1a22f5c472daa0d086ffc9
Signed-off-by: Rohit Gupta <rohgup@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: interactive: Use default min_sample_time if SDF is zero

Use min_sample_time to step down from max frequencies if
sampling_down_factor is set to zero.

Change-Id: I2e89bef6220557cb95efd20d658e0c05753b4c3c
Signed-off-by: Rohit Gupta <rohgup@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: Fix policy getting stuck when user & kernel min/max don't overlap

Every __cpufreq_set_policy starts with checking the new policy min/max has
some overlap with the current policy min/max. This works out fine until we
end up with the policy min/max being set to a range that doesn't overlap
with the user policy min/max. Once we get into this situation, the check at
the start of __cpufreq_set_policy fails and prevents us from getting out of
this state.

This only happens when one of the CPUFREQ_ADJUST/CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE
notifiers called inside __cpufreq_set_policy pick a min/max outside the
range of user policy min/max.

The real intent of the check at the start of __cpufreq_set_policy is to
make sure userspace can't set user policy min > user policy max. Since
__cpufreq_set_policy always gets called only with current user policy
min/max except when the actual user space policy min/max is changed, we can
fix the issue by simply checking the new policy min/max against current
user policy min/max.

Change-Id: Iaac805825e64d7985c41fb9052bd96baacdf3d6f
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: ondemand: Remove unnecessary synchronization attempt

Commit 1ce28d6b (ondemand: updated tune for hardware coordination)
brings in an attempt to synchronize expiry of per-cpu ondemand timer
at same time across all online cpus. This is meant to help systems
where "multiple cores share P-state via Hardware Coordination".

Synchronization is achieved by having timers expire when jiffy value
would be a perfect multiple of sampling window size. While such
synchronozation attemps are unnecessary on systems where cores don't
share P-states, it can hurt on power as cpus can now work off shorter
sampling windows (when percentage utilization over short window can be
observed to be high, causing frequency to be boosted).

Remove this unnecessary attempt to synchronize expiry of ondemand
timer across online cpus. A more acceptable solution could be to have
low-level architecture specific cpufreq driver indicate the need for
synchronization.

Change-Id: I6cb1cf3472ca106f029dc01248e0df7cfbb495b8
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: interactive: Fix null pointer dereference in interactive governor

For the sync_freq feature currently we check pcpu->policy->cur frequency
for each online cpu.  But for a CPU that isn't using interactive governor
or for an offline CPU, pcpu->policy can be null or an invalid value.
This patch tries to avoid that scenario by using pcpu->target_freq
instead of policy->cur to get the frequency of an online CPU.

Kernel crash without this patch:
[   20.132373] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000028
[   20.132375] pgd = c34f34c0
[   20.132377] pgd = ef6f2440
[   20.132383] [00000028] *pgd=00000000
[   20.132385]
[   20.132388] [00000028] *pgd=2e98f003, *pmd=00000000
[   20.132390] Internal error: Oops: 205 [#1] PREEMPT SMP ARM
[   20.132394] Modules linked in:
[   20.132398] CPU: 0 PID: 1560 Comm: chown Tainted: G        W    3.10.0-perf-gb12057b-00001-ga2c6c16-dirty #7
[   20.132401] task: ef9af300 ti: ee49c000 task.ti: ee49c000
[   20.132411] PC is at cpufreq_interactive_timer+0x10c/0x650
[   20.132415] LR is at cpufreq_interactive_timer+0x128/0x650
<snip>
[   20.133002] [<c07eb204>] (cpufreq_interactive_timer+0x10c/0x650) from [<c02804d8>] (call_timer_fn+0x80/0x198)
[   20.133012] [<c02804d8>] (call_timer_fn+0x80/0x198) from [<c0280acc>] (run_timer_softirq+0x1f8/0x270)
[   20.133019] [<c0280acc>] (run_timer_softirq+0x1f8/0x270) from [<c0279e20>] (__do_softirq+0x12c/0x2d4)
[   20.133025] [<c0279e20>] (__do_softirq+0x12c/0x2d4) from [<c027a2d4>] (irq_exit+0x74/0xc8)
[   20.133034] [<c027a2d4>] (irq_exit+0x74/0xc8) from [<c0206a00>] (handle_IRQ+0x68/0x8c)
[   20.133041] [<c0206a00>] (handle_IRQ+0x68/0x8c) from [<c02004b8>] (gic_handle_irq+0x3c/0x60)
[   20.133051] [<c02004b8>] (gic_handle_irq+0x3c/0x60) from [<c0ac6900>] (__irq_svc+0x40/0x70)
<snip>

Change-Id: Ie834f5d383de4d41e0fe6fbd40c8b0a0c05d82f5
Signed-off-by: Vijay Ganti <viganti@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: cpu-boost: Fix queue_delayed_work_on() race with hotplug

Calling queue_delayed_work_on() on a CPU that's in the process of getting
hotplugged out can result in that CPU infinitely looping in
msm_pm_wait_cpu_shutdown(). If queue_delayed_work_on() is called after the
CPU is hotplugged out, it could wake up the CPU without going through the
hotplug path and cause instability. To avoid this, make sure the CPU is and
stays online while queuing a work on it.

Change-Id: I1b4aae3db803e476b1a7676d08f495c1f38bb154
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: cpu-boost: Fix deadlock in wake_up of sync threads

If wake_up() is called on the current task on a CPU, the call will wait
until the current task is switched out before it wakes it up again and
returns.

The sync notifier for a CPU always runs on that CPU.

These two together can result in a deadlock if the sync notifier on CPU A
tries to wake up the sync thread of CPU A as it goes to sleep (is the
current task). A previous commit fixed this by adding a check to the sync
notifier to not wake up the sync thread of CPU A if it's the current task.

But this is still not sufficient to prevent deadlocks.

Sync thread of CPU A could be the current task on CPU B and sync thread of
CPU B could be the current task on CPU A.  At this point, if sync notifier
of CPU A and B try to wake up the sync threads of CPU A and B, it will
result in CPU A waiting for the current task in CPU B to get switched out
and CPU B waiting for the current task in CPU A to get switched out.  This
will result in a deadlock.

Prevent this scenario from happening by pinning the sync threads of each
CPU to run on that CPU. By doing this, we guarantee that sync notifiers
will only try to wake up sync threads running on that CPU. The fix added by
"cpufreq: cpu-boost: Resolve deadlock when waking up sync thread" ensures a
deadlock doesn't happen when a sync notifier tries to wake up a sync thread
running on that CPU.

Change-Id: I864e545529722a23886dd5a82f66089155d2d193
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>