Rework CFG edges to encode potentially unreachable edges, instead of just making them NULL.

This is to support some analyses, like -Wunreachable-code, that
will need to recover the original unprunned CFG edges in order
to suppress issues that aren't really bugs in practice.

There are two important changes here:

- AdjacentBlock replaces CFGBlock* for CFG successors/predecessors.
  This has the size of 2 pointers, instead of 1.  This is unlikely
  to have a significant memory impact on Sema since a single
  CFG usually exists at one time, but could impact the memory
  usage of the static analyzer.  This could possibly be optimized
  down to a single pointer with some cleverness.

- Predecessors can now contain null predecessors, which means
  some analyses doing a reverse traversal will need to take into
  account.  This already exists for successors, which contain
  successor slots for specific branch kinds (e.g., 'if') that
  expect a fixed number of successors, even if a branch is
  not reachable.
[CFG] Encode unreachable block information for successors when visiting 'if' statements.
[CFG] encode unreachable block information for would-have-been successors for calls to 'noreturn' functions.
[-Wunreachable-code] Prune out unreachable warnings where a 'break' is preceded by a call to a 'noreturn' function.

For example:

	unreachable();
    break;

This code is idiomatic and defensive.  The fact that 'break' is
unreachable here is not interesting.  This occurs frequently
in LLVM/Clang itself.