ARM: add support for kernel mode NEON

In order to safely support the use of NEON instructions in
kernel mode, some precautions need to be taken:
- the userland context that may be present in the registers (even
  if the NEON/VFP is currently disabled) must be stored under the
  correct task (which may not be 'current' in the UP case),
- to avoid having to keep track of additional vfpstates for the
  kernel side, disallow the use of NEON in interrupt context
  and run with preemption disabled,
- after use, re-enable preemption and re-enable the lazy restore
  machinery by disabling the NEON/VFP unit.

This patch adds the functions kernel_neon_begin() and
kernel_neon_end() which take care of the above. It also adds
the Kconfig symbol KERNEL_MODE_NEON to enable it.

Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chet Kener <Cl3Kener@gmail.com>
ARM: move VFP init to an earlier boot stage

In order to use the NEON unit in the kernel, we should
initialize it a bit earlier in the boot process so NEON users
that like to do a quick benchmark at load time (like the
xor_blocks or RAID-6 code) find the NEON/VFP unit already
enabled.

Replaced late_initcall() with core_initcall().

Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel at linaro.org>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico at linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chet Kener <Cl3Kener@gmail.com>
ARM: be strict about FP exceptions in kernel mode

The support code in vfp_support_entry does not care whether the
exception that caused it to be invoked occurred in kernel mode or
in user mode. However, neither condition that could trigger this
exception (lazy restore and VFP bounce to support code) is
currently allowable in kernel mode.

In either case, print a message describing the condition before
letting the undefined instruction handler run its course and trigger
an oops.

Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel at linaro.org>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico at linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chet Kener <Cl3Kener@gmail.com>
arm: vfpmodule: Fix warning procfs vfp_bounce reporting failed

Creation of procfs cpu/vfp_bounce fails because we're initialized too early. Fix
this by creating it on rootfs_initcall as before the NEON patches.

<6>[    0.130770] VFP support v0.3: implementor 51 architecture 64 part 6f varia
nt 2 rev 0
<4>[    0.130795] ------------[ cut here ]------------
<4>[    0.130813] WARNING: at fs/proc/generic.c:323 __xlate_proc_name+0xac/0xcc(
)
<4>[    0.130822] name 'cpu/vfp_bounce'
<4>[    0.130855] [<c010e26c>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x144) from [<c0a20f58>] (d
ump_stack+0x20/0x24)
<4>[    0.130879] [<c0a20f58>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24) from [<c019b670>] (warn_sl
owpath_common+0x58/0x70)
<4>[    0.130899] [<c019b670>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x58/0x70) from [<c019b704>
] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x48)
<4>[    0.130919] [<c019b704>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x48) from [<c02c2ad8>] (
__xlate_proc_name+0xac/0xcc)
<4>[    0.130938] [<c02c2ad8>] (__xlate_proc_name+0xac/0xcc) from [<c02c2b50>] (
__proc_create+0x58/0x100)
<4>[    0.130956] [<c02c2b50>] (__proc_create+0x58/0x100) from [<c02c2ed0>] (pro
c_create_data+0x5c/0xc0)
<4>[    0.130979] [<c02c2ed0>] (proc_create_data+0x5c/0xc0) from [<c0f03484>] (v
fp_init+0x19c/0x200)
<4>[    0.131000] [<c0f03484>] (vfp_init+0x19c/0x200) from [<c0f00c98>] (do_one_
initcall+0x98/0x168)
<4>[    0.131020] [<c0f00c98>] (do_one_initcall+0x98/0x168) from [<c0f00e60>] (k
ernel_init+0xf8/0x1b4)
<4>[    0.131043] [<c0f00e60>] (kernel_init+0xf8/0x1b4) from [<c01081a0>] (kerne
l_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)
<4>[    0.131076] ---[ end trace ea6d9a9b5e947151 ]---
<3>[    0.131086] Failed to create procfs node for VFP bounce reporting

Signed-off-by: Chet Kener <Cl3Kener@gmail.com>