No that I'm aware of. If you look at this page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_hash_functions), there is a list of Checksum functions, and most of them are either named without bit specification (SYSV, Luhn), or have multiple variants (CRC, sum, fletcher). Suppose we have those implemented as checksum modules, would you really like Adler to be only one named with "32" at the end?