Please do

On April 5, 2014 4:16:35 PM PDT, Igor Kiselev <notifications@github.com> wrote:
>> +      (new JSIL.MethodSignature(null, [], [])),
>> +      function _ctor() {
>> +      }
>> +    );
>> +
>> +    $.Method({ Static: true, Public: true }, "Create",
>> +      (new
>JSIL.MethodSignature($jsilcore.TypeRef("System.Runtime.CompilerServices.AsyncVoidMethodBuilder"),
>[], [])),
>> +      function Create() {
>> +          return new
>$jsilcore.System.Runtime.CompilerServices.AsyncVoidMethodBuilder();
>> +      }
>> +    );
>> +
>> +    $.Method({ Static: false, Public: true }, "AwaitOnCompleted",
>> +      new JSIL.MethodSignature(null,
>[$jsilcore.TypeRef("JSIL.Reference", ["!!0"]),
>$jsilcore.TypeRef("JSIL.Reference", ["!!1"])], ["TAwaiter",
>"TStateMachine"]),
>> +      function AwaitOnCompleted(TAwaiter, TStateMachine, awaiter,
>stateMachine) {
>> +          awaiter = JSIL.BoxedVariable.$Is(awaiter) ? awaiter.get()
>: awaiter;
>
>Should I create new bug for it?
>
>---
>Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
>https://github.com/sq/JSIL/pull/367/files#r11323686

- kg (mobile)