Avoid unportable usage of sscanf(UINT64_FORMAT).

On Mingw, it seems that scanf() doesn't necessarily accept the same format
codes that printf() does, and in particular it may fail to recognize %llu
even though printf() does.  Since configure only probes printf() behavior
while setting up the INT64_FORMAT macros, this means it's unsafe to use
those macros with scanf().  We had only one instance of such a coding
pattern, in contrib/pg_stat_statements, so change that code to avoid
the problem.

Per buildfarm warnings.  Back-patch to 9.0 where the troublesome code
was introduced.

Michael Paquier
Ensure cleanup in case of early errors in streaming base backups

Move the code that sends the initial status information as well as the
calculation of paths inside the ENSURE_ERROR_CLEANUP block. If this code
failed, we would "leak" a counter of number of concurrent backups, thereby
making the system always believe it was in backup mode. This could happen
if the sending failed (which it probably never did given that the small
amount of data to send would never cause a flush). It is very low risk, but
all operations after do_pg_start_backup should be protected.
Fix bogus %name-prefix option syntax in all our Bison files.

%name-prefix doesn't use an "=" sign according to the Bison docs, but it
silently accepted one anyway, until Bison 3.0.  This was originally a
typo of mine in commit 012abebab1bc72043f3f670bf32e91ae4ee04bd2, and we
seem to have slavishly copied the error into all the other grammar files.

Per report from Vik Fearing; analysis by Peter Eisentraut.

Back-patch to all active branches, since somebody might try to build
a back branch with up-to-date tools.
Revert "Fix bogus %name-prefix option syntax in all our Bison files."

This reverts commit 867363cbcbc3d0ccac813a74fbc8236d8873c266.

It turns out that the %name-prefix syntax without "=" does not work
at all in pre-2.4 Bison.  We are not prepared to make such a large
jump in minimum required Bison version just to suppress a warning
message in a version hardly any developers are using yet.
When 3.0 gets more popular, we'll figure out a way to deal with this.
In the meantime, BISONFLAGS=-Wno-deprecated is recommendable for
anyone using 3.0 who doesn't want to see the warning.
When using the OSSP UUID library, cache its uuid_t state object.

The original coding in contrib/uuid-ossp created and destroyed a uuid_t
object (or, in some cases, even two of them) each time it was called.
This is not the intended usage: you're supposed to keep the uuid_t object
around so that the library can cache its state across uses.  (Other UUID
libraries seem to keep equivalent state behind-the-scenes in static
variables, but OSSP chose differently.)  Aside from being quite inefficient,
creating a new uuid_t loses knowledge of the previously generated UUID,
which in theory could result in duplicate V1-style UUIDs being created
on sufficiently fast machines.

On at least some platforms, creating a new uuid_t also draws some entropy
from /dev/urandom, leaving less for the rest of the system.  This seems
sufficiently unpleasant to justify back-patching this change.
On OS X, link libpython normally, ignoring the "framework" framework.

As of Xcode 5.0, Apple isn't including the Python framework as part of the
SDK-level files, which means that linking to it might fail depending on
whether Xcode thinks you've selected a specific SDK version.  According to
their Tech Note 2328, they've basically deprecated the framework method of
linking to libpython and are telling people to link to the shared library
normally.  (I'm pretty sure this is in direct contradiction to the advice
they were giving a few years ago, but whatever.)  Testing says that this
approach works fine at least as far back as OS X 10.4.11, so let's just
rip out the framework special case entirely.  We do still need a special
case to decide that OS X provides a shared library at all, unfortunately
(I wonder why the distutils check doesn't work ...).  But this is still
less of a special case than before, so it's fine.

Back-patch to all supported branches, since we'll doubtless be hearing
about this more as more people update to recent Xcode.
PL/Python: Adjust the regression tests for Python 3.4

Back-patch commit d0765d50f429472d00554701ac6531c84d324811 into 9.3
and 9.2, which is as far back as we previously bothered to adjust the
regression tests for Python 3.3.  Per gripe from Honza Horak.
Set the process latch when processing recovery conflict interrupts.

Because RecoveryConflictInterrupt() didn't set the process latch
anything using the latter to wait for events didn't get notified about
recovery conflicts. Most latch users are never the target of recovery
conflicts, which explains the lack of reports about this until
now.
Since 9.3 two possible affected users exist though: The sql callable
pg_sleep() now uses latches to wait and background workers are
expected to use latches in their main loop. Both would currently wait
until the end of WaitLatch's timeout.

Fix by adding a SetLatch() to RecoveryConflictInterrupt(). It'd also
be possible to fix the issue by having each latch user set
set_latch_on_sigusr1. That seems failure prone and though, as most of
these callsites won't often receive recovery conflicts and thus will
likely only be tested against normal query cancels et al. It'd also be
unnecessarily verbose.

Backpatch to 9.1 where latches were introduced. Arguably 9.3 would be
sufficient, because that's where pg_sleep() was converted to waiting
on the latch and background workers got introduced; but there could be
user level code making use of the latch pre 9.3.
Make plpython_unicode regression test work in more database encodings.

This test previously used a data value containing U+0080, and would
therefore fail if the database encoding didn't have an equivalent to
that; which only about half of our supported server encodings do.
We could fall back to using some plain-ASCII character, but that seems
like it's losing most of the point of the test.  Instead switch to using
U+00A0 (no-break space), which translates into all our supported encodings
except the four in the EUC_xx family.

Per buildfarm testing.  Back-patch to 9.1, which is as far back as this
test is expected to succeed everywhere.  (9.0 has the test, but without
back-patching some 9.1 code changes we could not expect to get consistent
results across platforms anyway.)