suggest considering that we're building a tool that will also be for people who have little to no OpenStack experience. I'm concerned that "idiomatic purity" seems dismissive of those people who are Rubyists but not yet OpenStack-experienced.

On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Mike Hagedorn <notifications@github.com>
wrote:

>> +
>> +          @auth_token = data.body['access']['token']['id']
>> +
>> +          @service_catalog =
>> +            ServiceCatalog.from_response(self, data.body)
>> +
>> +          @response_hash = {
>> +            :user                     => data.body['access']['user'],
>> +            :tenant                   => data.body['access']['token']['tenant'],
>> +            # :identity_public_endpoint => nil,
>> +            # :server_management_url    => nil,
>> +            :token                    => @auth_token,
>> +            :expires                  => data.body['access']['token']['expires'],
>> +            :current_user_id          => data.body['access']['user'],
>> +            :unscoped_token           => nil
>> +          }
> there is certainly merit in striving for idiomatic purity here.  Its just that that part never confused me about Keystone :) (of course I have been slinging Openstack for almost 3 years now to be fair)
> ---
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/fog-openstack-tng/fog_openstack_tng/pull/10/files#r11309723