On 03/21/2014 11:30 AM, Valentine C wrote:

> There's no specific use or reason, but the list is highly arbitrary. I 
> don't have a strong position for its removal (mostly indifferent); 
> just thought it might be worth discussing. 

Fair enough, but that isn't quite what you said.

I share your concern about its arbitrary nature; perhaps a better 
approach would be to propose a specific replacement, or a process to 
reach consensus on one.

- Raz