Fixes #1327 -- adds multifernet

I don't think so. It's implemented that way, but it's way more complex to
document it that way. I think this is a good reliability / readability /
documentability tradeoff.

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Terry Chia <notifications@github.com>
wrote:

> In docs/fernet.rst:
>
> > @@ -67,7 +69,33 @@ symmetric (also known as "secret key") authenticated cryptography.
> >                                                    ``ttl``, it is malformed, or
> >                                                    it does not have a valid
> >                                                    signature.
> > -        :raises TypeError: This exception is raised if ``token`` is not ``bytes``.
> > +        :raises TypeError: This exception is raised if ``token`` is not
> > +                           ``bytes``.
> > +
> > +
> > +.. class:: MultiFernet(fernets)
> > +
> > +    This class implements key rotation for Fernet. It takes a ``list`` of
>
> Should the wording to changed to mention that any iterable work?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/pull/1422/files#r19128676>.
>



-- 
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to
say it." -- Evelyn Beatrice Hall (summarizing Voltaire)
"The people's good is the highest law." -- Cicero
GPG Key fingerprint: 125F 5C67 DFE9 4084