msm:camera: Limit prints in isp

Change every pr_err in msm_vfe_process_error_status to
pr_err_ratelimited to avoid watchdog reset

Change-Id: I248ac7f2d5c64a2743ba223eda77a63888ed1e0f
CRs-fixed: 584604
Signed-off-by: Yiduo Wang <yiduow@codeaurora.org>
(cherry picked from commit 52ed86e0e72116dc5e59ee38485d1d0a26b5855b)
Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
sync: Limit logging to particular fence on timeout and error

Signed-off-by: Prabhat Awasthi <pawasthi@codeaurora.org>
Change-Id: I5bd7d62260666cdd2a32212f0e828d2d5d7d7bba
Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
sync: signal pt before sync_timeline object gets destroyed

There is a race condition

Assume we have *one* sync_fence object, with *one* sync_pt
which belongs to *one* sync_timeline, given this condition,
sync_timeline->kref will have two counts, one for sync_timeline
(implicit) and another for sync_pt.

Assume following is the situation on CPU

Theead-1 : (Thread which calls sync_timeline_destroy())
  -> (some function calls)
   -> sync_timeline_destory()
    -> sync_timeline_signal() (CPU is inside this
function after putting reference to sync_timeline)

At this time Thread-2 comes and does following

Thread-2 : (fclose on fence fd)
> sync_fence_release() -> because of fclose() on fence object
 -> sync_fence_free()
  -> sync_pt_free()
   -> kref_put(&pt->parent->kref, sync_timeline_free);
    -> sync_timeline_free() (CPU is inside this because
this time kref will be zero after _put)

Thread-2 will free sync_timeline object before Thread-1
has finished its work inside sync_timeline_signal.

With this change we signals all sync_pt before putting
reference to sync_timeline object.

Change-Id: I66d7359cc5dca0352fda49f81953028e98b95993
Signed-off-by: Prakash Kamliya <pkamliya@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Hareesh Gundu <hareeshg@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
CPU hotplug, debug: detect imbalance between get_online_cpus() and put_online_cpus()

The synchronization between CPU hotplug readers and writers is achieved
by means of refcounting, safeguarded by the cpu_hotplug.lock.

get_online_cpus() increments the refcount, whereas put_online_cpus()
decrements it.  If we ever hit an imbalance between the two, we end up
compromising the guarantees of the hotplug synchronization i.e, for
example, an extra call to put_online_cpus() can end up allowing a
hotplug reader to execute concurrently with a hotplug writer.

So, add a WARN_ON() in put_online_cpus() to detect such cases where the
refcount can go negative, and also attempt to fix it up, so that we can
continue to run.

Change-Id: I144efeaa5899a2e8a3cddd21f010679cbaaa2459
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Git-commit: 075663d19885eb3738fd2d7dbdb8947e12563b68
Git-repo: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
Signed-off-by: Osvaldo Banuelos <osvaldob@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>