Fix regression around type skolems and if exprs.

If we start with:

    async({
      val res = await[S[_$1 with String]](s);
      if (true)
        await[Int](0)
      res
    })

Typechecking the application (before macro expansion) yields
(where the trees are printed in the form `expr{tpe}`):

    async[S[_$1#5738 with String#137]]({
      val res: S[_$1#5490 with String] forSome { type _$1#5490 } =
        await[S[_$1#5487 with String]](
          s{S[_$1#5487 with String]}
        ){S[_$1#5487 with String]};
      if (true)
        await(0)
      else
        ()
      res{S[_$1#5738 with String]}
    }{S[_$1#5738 with String]}){S[_$1#5738 with String]}

Note that the type of the second last line contains a skolemized
symbol `_$1#5738` of the existential `_$1#5490`. This is created
by this case in `Typer#adapt`:

    case et @ ExistentialType(_, _) if ((mode & (EXPRmode | LHSmode)) == EXPRmode) =>
      adapt(tree setType et.skolemizeExistential(context.owner, tree), mode, pt, original)

Our ANF rewrites part of this code to:

  <synthetic> val await$1: S[_$1#5487 with String] = await[S[_$1#5487 with String]](awaitable$1);
  val res: S[_$1#5490 with String] forSome { type _$1 } = await$1;

And later, the state machine transformation splits the last line into
a blank field and an assignment. Typechecking the `Assign` node
led to the an type error.

This commit manually attributes the types to the `Assign` node so
as to avoid these problem.

It also reigns in an overeager rewriting of `If` nodes in the
ANF transform, which was due to a bug in the label detection
logic introduced in 4fc5463538.

Thanks to @gnovark for yet another devilish test case and
analysis of the problem with label detection.