cpufreq: Manage only online cpus  cpufreq core doesn't manage offline cpus and if driver->init() has returned mask including offline cpus, it may result in unwanted behavior by cpufreq core or governors.  We need to get only online cpus in this mask. There are two places to fix this mask, cpufreq core and cpufreq driver. It makes sense to do this at common place and hence is done in core.  Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Francisco Franco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
cpufreq: Manage only online cpus  cpufreq core doesn't manage offline cpus 3/3
ARM: smp: Save CPU registers before IPI_CPU_STOP processing

When a kernel panic occurs on one CPU, other CPUs are instructed to stop
execution via the IPI_CPU_STOP message. These other CPUs dump their stack,
which may not be good enough to reconstruct their context to perform
post-mortem analysis. Dump each CPU's context
(before it started procesing the IPI) into a globally accessible structure
to allow for easier post-mortem debugging.

Change-Id: I68ac75f73d7ddaebaff9122b23e341bcb00e8fb9
Signed-off-by: Tingting Yang <tingting@codeaurora.org>
msm: cpufreq: Only apply driver limits for scaling_min/max_freq writes

When new values are written to scaling_min/max_freq sysfs files, the
current code applies all the limits imposed by various ADJUST and
INCOMPATIBLE notifiers handlers before storing them.

When the ADJUST and/or INCOMPATIBLE notifiers change their limits
frequently, this behavior makes it almost impossible for a
user/userspace process to store the scaling_min/max_freq limits
that go beyond the instantaneous limits imposed by the notifiers.
Since these sysfs nodes are typically meant to set limits that need
to be enforced for the foreseeable future, this is not a very user
friendly behavior.

So, change the behavior to only apply limits that are enforced by
the cpufreq driver. Typically, these are just the absolute limits
of the HW and don't change very often.

Change-Id: I1ccfaa2d1ee4ea595f882485d359dbdb407a0176
Signed-off-by: Deepak Katragadda <dkatraga@codeaurora.org>
debug: make the Kernel leaner - picked from @morfic
mm, vmalloc: use well-defined find_last_bit() func

Our intention in here is to find last_bit within the region to flush.
There is well-defined function, find_last_bit() for this purpose and its
performance may be slightly better than current implementation.  So change
it.

Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Reviewed-by: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
mm, vmalloc: remove useless variable in vmap_block

vbq in vmap_block isn't used. So remove it.

Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Reviewed-by: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
alarmtimer: implement minimum alarm interval for allowing suspend

alarmtimer suspend return -EBUSY if the next alarm will fire in less
than 2 seconds.  This allows one RTC seconds tick to occur subsequent
to this check before the alarm wakeup time is set, ensuring the wakeup
time is still in the future (assuming the RTC does not tick one more
second prior to setting the alarm).  If suspend is rejected, hold a
wakeup source for 2 seconds to process the alarm prior to reattempting
suspend.

Signed-off-by: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
alarmtimer: Use hrtimer per-alarm instead of per-base

Arve Hjønnevåg reported numerous crashes from the
"BUG_ON(timer->state != HRTIMER_STATE_CALLBACK)" check
in __run_hrtimer after it called alarmtimer_fired.

It ends up the alarmtimer code was not properly handling
possible failures of hrtimer_try_to_cancel, and because
these faulres occur when the underlying base hrtimer is
being run, this limits the ability to properly handle
modifications to any alarmtimers on that base.

Because much of the logic duplicates the hrtimer logic,
it seems that we might as well have a per-alarmtimer
hrtimer, and avoid the extra complextity of trying to
multiplex many alarmtimers off of one hrtimer.

Thus this patch moves the hrtimer to the alarm structure
and simplifies the management logic.

Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com>
Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reported-by: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>