Parameter labelled amplitude in GaussianPSF is really the integrated flux

The easy way to see this is to make a GaussianPSF with different parameters for sigma
(see the tests).
Then evaluate the PSF over a grid and sum it up. The sum does not change, but the value of the
central pixel does. So, clearly, this parameter is the total flux, not the amplitude.

The theoretical way to think about it, is that the value of the function is the integrated
flux over a pixel, not the amplitude over a pixel. That's why what's was called `A` in the
formula before is not the amplitude, but the integrated flux.
(and thus I gave it a new character).
Run through different sigma keywords
Parameterize psf test with sigma
Merge pull request #145 from hamogu/renameamplitude

Parameter labelled amplitude in GaussianPSF is really the integrated flu...
Change to np.max
actually, should be np.maximum
Merge pull request #156 from larrybradley/fixmax

Change max to np.max
Add segment_photometry
Update segment_photometry docs
Allow label subset for segment_photometry
Change index to labels and make flux nan for invalid labels
Implement error, gain, and mask options in segment_photometry
Implement background option in segment_photometry
Add mask interpolation
WIP: segment_props
Rename segmentation module
WIP: segment_props
WIP: segmentation props
Clean up segment_photometry api docs
Move centroid, area, etc. from segment_photometry to segment_props; more clean up