add model adapter for sequel
use sequel reflection method to get associated class instead
Adding support for "can?" check multiple subjects

The behaviour when an array of subject is given, is check if there is a permission at least on one of the given subjects.
Assuring that with both subjects without permission can? returns false
Adjust CHANGELOG
Add link to mailing list.
Update Travis build image.
Update Travis as Rubinius now builds successfully.
Ignore Mac's .DS_Store files and config folder, which Rubymine generates.
Merge pull request #6 from Loremaster/gitignore

Ignore some files
.ruby-version should not be included in the gem.
Ignore ruby version settings and gemsets.
Sigh... RBX is failing to build on Travis again.
Add docs badge to README
Fix deprecation `I18n.enforce_available_locales will default to true in the future ...` in specs by skipping locale validation in spec_helper (using Rails 3 behavior).
supermodel and rails bumped.
Merge pull request #9 from Loremaster/gems-bumps

Gemspec update
Merge pull request #8 from rrrene/patch-1

Add docs badge to README
Changing how to use can? to check many subjects

During the test to permit pass an Object as a hash I needed to change how call can? to mantain the functionality to pass any object inclusive an instance of Array as a single subject.
To assure that funciontality, now we need to pass a hash containing a key :any and the array of subjects as his value.
The array deals with the same objects that an usual can? does... and obviously, that hash is only necessary when checking multiple subjects.
Merge pull request #7 from Loremaster/fix-i18n-deprecation

Fix deprecation `I18n.enforce_available_locales will default to true in the future ...`