Handle a single carelink basal rate better

@jebeck @jh-bate @kentquirk 

These are the changes to handle a single carelink schedule better.  I tested not only via the unit test, but by pulling the offending data down locally and running it.  It is working.
cool - noted


On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:03 AM, cheddar <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> In lib/carelink/index.js:
>
> > @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ exports.parse = function (inStream) {
> >      .map(function(e) {
> >              if (startTime == null) {
> >                var startTimeString = e.split(',')[1];
> > -              startTime = moment(startTimeString, 'MM/DD/YY HH:mm:ss');
> > +              startTime = moment.utc(startTimeString, 'MM/DD/YY HH:mm:ss');
>
> A significant chunk of stuff will have to be rewritten with the new data
> model and the change of programming language, so I wouldn't rush to make
> too many changes to sundial based on server-side code like this.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/tidepool-org/in-d-gestion/pull/29/files#r13731945>.
>