netdev-dpdk: Fix race condition with DPDK mempools in non pmd threads

DPDK mempools rely on rte_lcore_id() to implement a thread-local cache.
Our non pmd threads had rte_lcore_id() == 0. This allowed concurrent access to
the "thread-local" cache, causing crashes.

This commit resolves the issue with the following changes:

- Every non pmd thread has the same lcore_id (0, for management reasons), which
  is not shared with any pmd thread (lcore_id for pmd threads now start from 1)
- DPDK mbufs must be allocated/freed in pmd threads. When there is the need to
  use mempools in non pmd threads, like in dpdk_do_tx_copy(), a mutex must be
  held.
- The previous change does not allow us anymore to pass DPDK mbufs to handler
  threads: therefore this commit partially revert 143859ec63d45e. Now packets
  are copied for upcall processing. We can remove the extra memcpy by
  processing upcalls in the pmd thread itself.

With the introduction of the extra locking, the packet throughput will be lower
in the following cases:

- When using internal (tap) devices with DPDK devices on the same datapath.
  Anyway, to support internal devices efficiently, we needed DPDK KNI devices,
  which will be proper pmd devices and will not need this locking.
- When packets are processed in the slow path by non pmd threads. This overhead
  can be avoided by handling the upcalls directly in pmd threads (a change that
  has already been proposed by Ryan Wilson)

Also, the following two fixes have been introduced:
- In dpdk_free_buf() use rte_pktmbuf_free_seg() instead of rte_mempool_put().
  This allows OVS to run properly with CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_MBUF_DEBUG DPDK option
- Do not bulk free mbufs in a transmission queue. They may belong to different
  mempools

Signed-off-by: Daniele Di Proietto <ddiproietto@vmware.com>
Acked-by: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@nicira.com>