cullable: Reset the culling state instead of skipping the traversal

When we traversed down to reset the culling state, previously we
would just skip any actors that wanted culling. In order to properly
reset the unobscured_region before painting, we need to traverse down
to these places as well. Do this by calling cull_out with NULL regions
for both arguments, and adapt existing cull_out implementations to
match.
shaped-texture: Move unobscured_region processing here

We want to remove a bunch of auxilliary duties from the MetaWindowActor
and MetaSurfaceActor, including some details of how culling is done.
Move the unobscured region culling code to the MetaShapedTexture, which
helps the actor become "more independent".

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
Always map the client and frame windows

Traditionally, WMs unmap windows when minimizing them, and map them
when restoring them or wanting to show them for other reasons, like
upon creation.

However, as metacity morphed into mutter, we optionally chose to keep
windows mapped for the lifetime of the window under the user option
"live-window-previews", which makes the code keep windows mapped so it
can show window preview for minimized windows in other places, like
Alt-Tab and Expose.

I removed this preference two years ago mechanically, by removing all
the if statements, but never went through and cleaned up the code so
that windows are simply mapped for the lifetime of the window -- the
"architecture" of the old code that maps and unmaps on show/hide was
still there.

Remove this now.

The one case we still need to be careful of is shaded windows, in which
we do still unmap the client window. Theoretically, we might want to
show previews of shaded windows in the overview and Alt-Tab, so we remove
the complex unmap tracking for this later.

At the same time, simplify the compositor interface by removing
meta_compositor_window_[un]mapped API, and instead adding/removing the
window on-demand.

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
Move position-changed / size-changed signals to the MetaWindow

They fit more appropriately over here...

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor

The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:

  * X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
    not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
    the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
    extension messiness.

    In thi scase, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.

  * Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
    Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
    as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
    Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
    wl_surface.

    In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
    priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.

  * XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
    above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
    the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
    like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
    opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.

    In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
    priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.

We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:

  * MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
    it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
    deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.

  * MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
    for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
    COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
    xf86-video-wayland DDX.

Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, we can implement a "Wayland" backend for this, hopefully
using our MetaWindow abstraction.

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631