(WIP) SPARK-2045 Sort-based shuffle

This adds a new ShuffleManager based on sorting, as described in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2045. The bulk of the code is in an ExternalSorter class that is similar to ExternalAppendOnlyMap, but sorts key-value pairs by partition ID and can be used to create a single sorted file with a map task's output. (Longer-term I think this can take on the remaining functionality in ExternalAppendOnlyMap and replace it so we don't have code duplication.)

The main TODOs still left are:
- [x] enabling ExternalSorter to merge across spilled files
  - [x] with an Ordering
  - [x] without an Ordering, using the keys' hash codes
- [x] adding more tests (e.g. a version of our shuffle suite that runs on this)
- [ ] rebasing on top of the size-tracking refactoring in #1165 when that is merged
- [x] disabling spilling if spark.shuffle.spill is set to false

Despite this though, this seems to work pretty well (running successfully in cases where the hash shuffle would OOM, such as 1000 reduce tasks on executors with only 1G memory), and it seems to be comparable in speed or faster than hash-based shuffle (it will create much fewer files for the OS to keep track of). So I'm posting it to get some early feedback.

After these TODOs are done, I'd also like to enable ExternalSorter to sort data within each partition by a key as well, which will allow us to use it to implement external spilling in reduce tasks in `sortByKey`.
Good question, but files on disk actually get cleaned by BlockManager directly if cleaning is turned on, and sort-based shuffle is set up to only use files. ShuffleBlockManager had extra state in memory in the form of metadata, that's why it needs its own cleaner. But I don't think there's an issue here.

It will be important to do something for unregisterShuffle, but right now nothing calls that. That's part of the API because I wanted to move the MapOutputTracker behind the ShuffleManager as well. But any patches to move more stuff behind it are welcome, and I agree the ShuffleBlockManager should be specific to hash-based shuffle.