backlight_dimmer: give two dimmer options and create sysfs node

Signed-off-by: flar2 <asegaert@gmail.com>
msm: memutils: memcpy, memmove, copy_page optimization
Preload farther to take advantage of the memory bus, and assume
64-byte cache lines.  Unroll some pairs of ldm/stm as well, for
unexplainable reasons.

Future enhancements should include,

- #define for how far to preload, possibly defined separately for
  memcpy, copy_*_user
- Tuning for misaligned buffers
- Tuning for memmove
- Tuning for small buffers
- Understanding mechanism behind ldm/stm unroll causing some gains
  in copy_to_user

BASELINE (msm8960pro):
======================================================================
memcpy 1000MB at 5MB       : took 808850 usec, bandwidth 1236.236 MB/s
copy_to_user 1000MB at 5MB : took 810071 usec, bandwidth 1234.234 MB/s
copy_from_user 1000MB at 5M: took 942926 usec, bandwidth 1060.060 MB/s
memmove 1000GB at 5MB      : took 848588 usec, bandwidth 1178.178 MB/s
copy_to_user 1000GB at 4kB : took 847916 usec, bandwidth 1179.179 MB/s
copy_from_user 1000GB at 4k: took 935113 usec, bandwidth 1069.069 MB/s
copy_page 1000GB at 4kB    : took 779459 usec, bandwidth 1282.282 MB/s

THIS PATCH:
======================================================================
memcpy 1000MB at 5MB       : took 346223 usec, bandwidth 2888.888 MB/s
copy_to_user 1000MB at 5MB : took 348084 usec, bandwidth 2872.872 MB/s
copy_from_user 1000MB at 5M: took 348176 usec, bandwidth 2872.872 MB/s
memmove 1000GB at 5MB      : took 348267 usec, bandwidth 2871.871 MB/s
copy_to_user 1000GB at 4kB : took 377018 usec, bandwidth 2652.652 MB/s
copy_from_user 1000GB at 4k: took 371829 usec, bandwidth 2689.689 MB/s
copy_page 1000GB at 4kB    : took 383763 usec, bandwidth 2605.605 MB/s

Change-Id: I843fe77192d61ce35a81e75d76fc09f0a472e98a
Signed-off-by: Chris Fries <C.Fries@motorola.com>

Conflicts:
	arch/arm/lib/Makefile
	arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig
	arch/arm/mach-msm/Makefile

Conflicts:
	arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig

Conflicts:
	arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig

Conflicts:
	arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig
msm: memutils: memcpy, memmove optimization

1. To fit 8x26 64-bytes cache line size, we change preload steps as 64Bytes.
2. According to tune result, change preload distance as 5 cache lines.
3. According to tune result, re-arrange the ld/str order as back-to-back
   for copy_from_user.

The markable improvement:
	memcpy : 5%
	copy_to_user : 9%
	copy_from_user : 13%
	memmove : 37%

Raw data is as below:

BASELINE:
	memcpy 1000MB at 5MB       : took 1547098 usec, bandwidth 646.646 MB/s
	copy_to_user 1000MB at 5MB : took 1704308 usec, bandwidth 586.586 MB/s
	copy_from_user 1000MB at 5M: took 1777090 usec, bandwidth 562.562 MB/s
	memmove 1000GB at 5MB      : took 1066205 usec, bandwidth 937.937 MB/s
	copy_to_user 1000GB at 4kB : took 1774866 usec, bandwidth 563.563 MB/s
	copy_from_user 1000GB at 4k: took 1797654 usec, bandwidth 556.556 MB/s
	copy_page 1000GB at 4kB    : took 1644606 usec, bandwidth 608.608 MB/s
	memmove 1000GB at 4kB      : took 1236227 usec, bandwidth 808.808 MB/s

THIS PATCH:
	memcpy 1000MB at 5MB       : took 1475835 usec, bandwidth 677.677 MB/s
	copy_to_user 1000MB at 5MB : took 1559060 usec, bandwidth 641.641 MB/s
	copy_from_user 1000MB at 5M: took 1561603 usec, bandwidth 640.640 MB/s
	memmove 1000GB at 5MB      : took 861664 usec, bandwidth 1160.160 MB/s
	copy_to_user 1000GB at 4kB : took 1673501 usec, bandwidth 597.597 MB/s
	copy_from_user 1000GB at 4k: took 1674006 usec, bandwidth 597.597 MB/s
	copy_page 1000GB at 4kB    : took 1691358 usec, bandwidth 591.591 MB/s
	memmove 1000GB at 4kB      : took 882985 usec, bandwidth 1132.132 MB/s

Change-Id: I83bec3b7a9dd9cd88890eaa7ec423363e230a651
Signed-off-by: Hong-Mei Li <a21834@motorola.com>
Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.pcs.mot.com/550383
SLT-Approved: Slta Waiver <sltawvr@motorola.com>
Tested-by: Jira Key <jirakey@motorola.com>
Reviewed-by: Klocwork kwcheck <klocwork-kwcheck@sourceforge.mot.com>
Reviewed-by: Check Patch <CHEKPACH@motorola.com>
Reviewed-by: Yi-Wei Zhao <gbjc64@motorola.com>
Submit-Approved: Jira Key <jirakey@motorola.com>
arm: lib: Fix makefile issue
Fix the typo introduced by commit fb7051a.

Change-Id: Ia23c80f903ed431e60e4ba17c9c6d527e6febd87
Signed-off-by: Hong-Mei Li <a21834@motorola.com>
Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.pcs.mot.com/527915
SLT-Approved: Gerrit Code Review <gerrit-blurdev@motorola.com>
Tested-by: Jira Key <jirakey@motorola.com>
Reviewed-by: Christopher Fries <qcf001@motorola.com>
Submit-Approved: Jira Key <jirakey@motorola.com>
arch: arm: lib: optimize memcpy for cortex-A15

The LDRD/STRD instruction is faster than LDM/STM on Cortex-A15.
Also optimized preload cache size for Cortex-A15.

Added USE_LDRDSTRD_OVER_LDMSTM to turn on LDRD/STRD optimization.
Added ARM_PLD_SIZE, default 32. Should set to 64 for Cortex-A15.

Bug 1185248

Signed-off-by: Chandler Zhang <chazhang@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chet Kener <Cl3Kener@gmail.com>
GPU: start at 200MHz instead of 320MHz
lz4: ensure length does not wrap

Given some pathologically compressed data, lz4 could possibly decide to
wrap a few internal variables, causing unknown things to happen.  Catch
this before the wrapping happens and abort the decompression.

Change-Id: I055b70a212d4c0f3f2ad8e57eebec6ce8aa8b4a6
Reported-by: "Don A. Bailey" <donb@securitymouse.com>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
lz4: fix another possible overrun

There is one other possible overrun in the lz4 code as implemented by
Linux at this point in time (which differs from the upstream lz4
codebase, but will get synced at in a future kernel release.)  As
pointed out by Don, we also need to check the overflow in the data
itself.

While we are at it, replace the odd error return value with just a
"simple" -1 value as the return value is never used for anything other
than a basic "did this work or not" check.

Change-Id: I839144f135e2a4eb3c1fdcf1fa418ea34d481ea3
Reported-by: "Don A. Bailey" <donb@securitymouse.com>
Reported-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
lz4: add overrun checks to lz4_uncompress_unknownoutputsize()

Jan points out that I forgot to make the needed fixes to the
lz4_uncompress_unknownoutputsize() function to mirror the changes done
in lz4_decompress() with regards to potential pointer overflows.

The only in-kernel user of this function is the zram code, which only
takes data from a valid compressed buffer that it made itself, so it's
not a big issue.  But due to external kernel modules using this
function, it's better to be safe here.

Change-Id: If7e9e5778ef7f8b6b28d34e8a1143e7f929a51e6
Reported-by: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "Don A. Bailey" <donb@securitymouse.com>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
assorted tweaks
ext4: Add support for FIDTRIM, a best-effort ioctl for deep discard trim

* What
This provides an interface for issuing an FITRIM which uses the
secure discard instead of just a discard.
Only the eMMC command is "secure", and not how the FS uses it:
due to the fact that the FS might reassign a region somewhere else,
the original deleted data will not be affected by the "trim" which only
handles un-used regions.
So we'll just call it "deep discard", and note that this is a
"best effort" cleanup.

* Why
Once in a while, We want to be able to cleanup most of the unused blocks
after erasing a bunch of files.
We don't want to constantly secure-discard via a mount option.

From an eMMC spec perspective, it tells the device to really get rid of
all the data for the specified blocks and not just put them back into the
pool of free ones (unlike the normal TRIM). The eMMC spec says the
secure trim handling must make sure the data (and metadata) is not available
anymore. A simple TRIM doesn't clear the data, it just puts blocks in the
free pool.
JEDEC Standard No. 84-A441
  7.6.9 Secure Erase
  7.6.10 Secure Trim

From an FS perspective, it is acceptable to leave some data behind.
 - directory entries related to deleted files
 - databases entries related to deleted files
 - small-file data stored in inode extents
 - blocks held by the FS waiting to be re-used (mitigated by sync).
 - blocks reassigned by the FS prior to FIDTRIM.

Change-Id: I676a1404a80130d93930c84898360f2e6fb2f81e
Signed-off-by: Geremy Condra <gcondra@google.com>
Signed-off-by: JP Abgrall <jpa@google.com>

Conflicts:
	fs/ext4/mballoc.c
msm: Fix high load average from uninterruptible waits

 * The load average on all MSMs is currently hovering at around 14
   due to uninterruptible waits in various places.
 * Convert these waits to interruptible waits to bring the load
   back down to zero at idle.

Change-Id: I14bad4af135b1594e235e2252cb484cb34d91054

Signed-off-by: flar2 <asegaert@gmail.com>