nfsd4: warn on finding lockowner without stateid's

commit 27b11428b7de097c42f205beabb1764f4365443b upstream.

The current code assumes a one-to-one lockowner<->lock stateid
correspondance.

Change-Id: I9d58d0e7ded69b4bdc1015d8c200adfd2f479625
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
nfsd4: remove lockowner when removing lock stateid

commit a1b8ff4c97b4375d21b6d6c45d75877303f61b3b upstream.

The nfsv4 state code has always assumed a one-to-one correspondance
between lock stateid's and lockowners even if it appears not to in some
places.

We may actually change that, but for now when FREE_STATEID releases a
lock stateid it also needs to release the parent lockowner.

Symptoms were a subsequent LOCK crashing in find_lockowner_str when it
calls same_lockowner_ino on a lockowner that unexpectedly has an empty
so_stateids list.

Change-Id: If7fa3547935e4a1e209df28bb448f0d63e1add12
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
percpu: make pcpu_alloc_chunk() use pcpu_mem_free() instead of kfree()

commit 5a838c3b60e3a36ade764cf7751b8f17d7c9c2da upstream.

pcpu_chunk_struct_size = sizeof(struct pcpu_chunk) +
	BITS_TO_LONGS(pcpu_unit_pages) * sizeof(unsigned long)

It hardly could be ever bigger than PAGE_SIZE even for large-scale machine,
but for consistency with its couterpart pcpu_mem_zalloc(),
use pcpu_mem_free() instead.

Commit b4916cb17c26 ("percpu: make pcpu_free_chunk() use
pcpu_mem_free() instead of kfree()") addressed this problem, but
missed this one.

tj: commit message updated

Change-Id: I829580b06e5e86991c6e7cad397fbd509c01ed7c
Signed-off-by: Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Fixes: 099a19d91ca4 ("percpu: allow limited allocation before slab is online)
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>