Optimized imports

Optimized imports and arranged according to scala style guide @
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Spark+Code+Style+Guide#SparkCodeStyleGuide-Imports

Author: NirmalReddy <nirmal.reddy@imaginea.com>
Author: NirmalReddy <nirmal_reddy2000@yahoo.com>

Closes #613 from NirmalReddy/opt-imports and squashes the following commits:

578b4f5 [NirmalReddy] imported java.lang.Double as JDouble
a2cbcc5 [NirmalReddy] addressed the comments
776d664 [NirmalReddy] Optimized imports in core
[SPARK-1105] fix site scala version error in doc

https://spark-project.atlassian.net/browse/SPARK-1105

fix site scala version error

Author: CodingCat <zhunansjtu@gmail.com>

Closes #616 from CodingCat/doc_version and squashes the following commits:

eafd99a [CodingCat] fix site scala version error in doc
Revert "[SPARK-1105] fix site scala version error in doc"

This reverts commit d99773d5bba674cc1434c86435b6d9b3739314c8.
SPARK-1106: check key name and identity file before launch a cluster

I launched an EC2 cluster without providing a key name and an identity file. The error showed up after two minutes. It would be good to check those options before launch, given the fact that EC2 billing rounds up to hours.

JIRA: https://spark-project.atlassian.net/browse/SPARK-1106

Author: Xiangrui Meng <meng@databricks.com>

Closes #617 from mengxr/ec2 and squashes the following commits:

2dfb316 [Xiangrui Meng] check key name and identity file before launch a cluster
[SPARK-1105] fix site scala version error in docs

https://spark-project.atlassian.net/browse/SPARK-1105

fix site scala version error

Author: CodingCat <zhunansjtu@gmail.com>

Closes #618 from CodingCat/doc_version and squashes the following commits:

39bb8aa [CodingCat] more fixes
65bedb0 [CodingCat] fix site scala version error in doc
MLLIB-24:  url of "Collaborative Filtering for Implicit Feedback Datasets" in ALS is invalid now

url of "Collaborative Filtering for Implicit Feedback Datasets"  is invalid now. A new url is provided. http://research.yahoo.com/files/HuKorenVolinsky-ICDM08.pdf

Author: Chen Chao <crazyjvm@gmail.com>

Closes #619 from CrazyJvm/master and squashes the following commits:

a0b54e4 [Chen Chao] change url to IEEE
9e0e9f0 [Chen Chao] correct spell mistale
fcfab5d [Chen Chao] wrap line to to fit within 100 chars
590d56e [Chen Chao] url error
MLLIB-22. Support negative implicit input in ALS

I'm back with another less trivial suggestion for ALS:

In ALS for implicit feedback, input values are treated as weights on squared-errors in a loss function (or rather, the weight is a simple function of the input r, like c = 1 + alpha*r). The paper on which it's based assumes that the input is positive. Indeed, if the input is negative, it will create a negative weight on squared-errors, which causes things to go haywire. The optimization will try to make the error in a cell as large possible, and the result is silently bogus.

There is a good use case for negative input values though. Implicit feedback is usually collected from signals of positive interaction like a view or like or buy, but equally, can come from "not interested" signals. The natural representation is negative values.

The algorithm can be extended quite simply to provide a sound interpretation of these values: negative values should encourage the factorization to come up with 0 for cells with large negative input values, just as much as positive values encourage it to come up with 1.

The implications for the algorithm are simple:
* the confidence function value must not be negative, and so can become 1 + alpha*|r|
* the matrix P should have a value 1 where the input R is _positive_, not merely where it is non-zero. Actually, that's what the paper already says, it's just that we can't assume P = 1 when a cell in R is specified anymore, since it may be negative

This in turn entails just a few lines of code change in `ALS.scala`:
* `rs(i)` becomes `abs(rs(i))`
* When constructing `userXy(us(i))`, it's implicitly only adding where P is 1. That had been true for any us(i) that is iterated over, before, since these are exactly the ones for which P is 1. But now P is zero where rs(i) <= 0, and should not be added

I think it's a safe change because:
* It doesn't change any existing behavior (unless you're using negative values, in which case results are already borked)
* It's the simplest direct extension of the paper's algorithm
* (I've used it to good effect in production FWIW)

Tests included.

I tweaked minor things en route:
* `ALS.scala` javadoc writes "R = Xt*Y" when the paper and rest of code defines it as "R = X*Yt"
* RMSE in the ALS tests uses a confidence-weighted mean, but the denominator is not actually sum of weights

Excuse my Scala style; I'm sure it needs tweaks.

Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>

Closes #500 from srowen/ALSNegativeImplicitInput and squashes the following commits:

cf902a9 [Sean Owen] Support negative implicit input in ALS
953be1c [Sean Owen] Make weighted RMSE in ALS test actually weighted; adjust comment about R = X*Yt