Is this a comment about the docstring, or about the procedure used?

On Tuesday, January 14, 2014, Stefan van der Walt wrote:

> In dipy/reconst/csdeconv.py:
>
> > @@ -35,12 +35,12 @@ def __init__(self, gtab, response, reg_sphere=None, sh_order=8, lambda_=1, tau=0
> >          Parameters
> >          ----------
> >          gtab : GradientTable
> > -        response : tuple or callable
> > -            If tuple, then it should have two elements. The first is the eigen-values as an (3,) ndarray
> > -            and the second is the signal value for the response function without diffusion weighting.
> > -            This is to be able to generate a single fiber synthetic signal. If callable then the function
> > -            should return an ndarray with the all the signal values for the response function. The response
> > -            function will be used as deconvolution kernel ([1]_)
> > +        response : tuple
> > +            A tuple with two elements. The first is the eigen-values as an (3,)
>
> Which eigen-values are these? And where should the signal be evaluated to
> give the response function?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/nipy/dipy/pull/314/files#r8861319>
> .
>