My mistake. I thought that was being pulled from an ADAMRecord (which has a recordGroupName).

This does raise a question about naming. In general, an ID tends to imply an Integer type whereas a NAME tends to imply a string. I think it's better to be consistent with the other fields in the ADAM schema (e.g. referenceName/referenceId, mateReferenceName/mateReferenceId, etc). It's just something we'll have to remember moving forward.

Sorry for the comment noise.