Automatic date update in version.in
state->dr_control_mirror == 0 failed assertion in gdbserver on Windows XP

When using GDBserver on Windows XP, GDBserver reports an assertion
failure after hitting a hardware watchpoint. The problem was reproduced
using the sources from gdb.ada/int_deref, but should probably reproduce
with any scenario involving hardware watchpoints.

In our scenario, we break on line 5, just before the increment, insert
a watchhpoint on it, and then continue:

    (gdb) b foo.adb:5
    Breakpoint 1 at 0x4017c2: file foo.adb, line 5.
    (gdb) cont
    Continuing.

    Breakpoint 1, foo () at foo.adb:5
    5          Pck.Watch := Pck.Watch + 1;
    (gdb) watch watch
    Hardware watchpoint 2: watch
    (gdb) c
    Continuing.
    Remote communication error.  Target disconnected.: Invalid argument.

The immediate cause for the communication error is easily explained,
gdbserver crashes due to a failed assertion:

    x86_remove_aligned_watchpoint: Assertion `state->dr_control_mirror == 0' failed.

The assertion occurs because debug_reg_state.dr_control_mirror gets
overwritten by the value read from the inferior, when processing
the watchpoint event in win32_wait: win32_wait finds that we stopped,
calls get_thread_regcache which causes i386_get_thread_context to
get called, which then...

  if (th->tid == current_event->dwThreadId)
    {
      /* Copy dr values from the current thread.  */
      struct x86_debug_reg_state *dr = &debug_reg_state;
      [...]
      dr->dr_control_mirror = th->context.Dr7;
    }

Both should be identical, normally making this a no-op, but
it turns out that bits 12-11-10 are documented as being fixed
and equal to 001. Our handling of dr_control_mirror does not
manage those bits, and leaves them as zeros instead. So, when
we overwrite the value from the thread's DR7 register, we
accidentally set bit 10, causing state->dr_control_mirror
to be 0x400 after we've cleared everything internally.

This patch fixes the issue by removing the statement setting
state->dr_control_mirror to the thread's DR7 register value.

gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog:

        PR server/17487
        * win32-i386-low.c (i386_get_thread_context): Do not set
        dr->dr_control_mirror.
PR python/17364

gdb/ChangeLog:

	* python/lib/gdb/__init__.py (packages): Add "printer".
	* python/lib/gdb/command/bound_registers.py: Moved to ...
	* python/lib/gdb/printer/bound_registers.py: ... here.
	Add printer to global set of builtin printers.  Rename printer from
	"bound" to "mpx_bound128".
	* python/lib/gdb/printing.py (_builtin_pretty_printers): New global,
	registered as global "builtin" printer.
	(add_builtin_pretty_printer): New function.
	* data-directory/Makefile.in (PYTHON_FILE_LIST): Update, and add
	gdb/printer/__init__.py.
Automatic date update in version.in
Automatic date update in version.in
Make common code handle target_terminal_* idempotency

I found a place that should be giving back the terminal to the target,
but only if the target was already owning it.  So I need to add a
getter for who owns the terminal.

The trouble is that several places/target have their own globals to
track this state:

 - inflow.c:terminal_is_ours
 - remote.c:remote_async_terminal_ours_p
 - linux-nat.c:async_terminal_is_ours
 - go32-nat.c:terminal_is_ours

While one might think of adding a new target_ops method to query this,
conceptually, this state isn't really part of a particular target_ops.
Considering multi-target, the core shouldn't have to ask all targets
to know whether it's GDB that owns the terminal.  There's only one GDB
(or rather, only one top level interpreter).

So what this comment does is add a new global that is tracked by the
core instead.  A subsequent pass may later remove the other globals.

Tested on x86_64 Fedora 20, native and gdbserver.

gdb/
2014-10-17  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

	* target.c (enum terminal_state): New enum.
	(terminal_state): New global.
	(target_terminal_init): New function.
	(target_terminal_inferior): Skip if inferior already owns the
	terminal.
	(target_terminal_ours, target_terminal_ours_for_output): New
	functions.
	* target.h (target_terminal_init): Convert to function prototype.
	(target_terminal_ours_for_output): Convert to function prototype
	and tweak comment.
	(target_terminal_ours): Convert to function prototype and tweak
	comment.
	* windows-nat.c (do_initial_windows_stuff): Call
	target_terminal_init instead of child_terminal_init_with_pgrp.
PR gdb/17472: With annotations, input while executing in the foreground crashes readline/GDB

Jan caught an intermittent GDB crash with the annota1.exp test:

 Starting program: .../gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1 ^M
 [...]
 FAIL: gdb.base/annota1.exp: run until main breakpoint (timeout)
 [...]
 readline: readline_callback_read_char() called with no handler!^M
 ERROR: Process no longer exists

All we need to is to continue the inferior in the foreground, and type
a command while the inferior is running.  E.g.:

 (gdb) set annotate 2

 ▒▒pre-prompt
 (gdb)
 ▒▒prompt
 c

 ▒▒post-prompt
 Continuing.

 ▒▒starting

 ▒▒frames-invalid

 *inferior is running now*

 p 1<ret>

 readline: readline_callback_read_char() called with no handler!
 Aborted (core dumped)
 $


When we run a foreground execution command we call
target_terminal_inferior to stop GDB from processing input, and to put
the inferior's terminal settings in effect.  Then we tell readline to
hide the prompt with display_gdb_prompt, which clears readline's input
callback too.  When the target stops, we call target_terminal_ours,
which re-installs stdin in the event loop, and then we redisplay the
prompt, reinstalling the readline callbacks.

However, when annotations are in effect, the "frames-invalid"
annotation code calls target_terminal_ours after 'resume' had already
called target_terminal_inferior:

 (top-gdb) bt
 #0  0x000000000056b82f in annotate_frames_invalid () at gdb/annotate.c:219
 #1  0x000000000072e6cc in reinit_frame_cache () at gdb/frame.c:1705
 #2  0x0000000000594bb9 in registers_changed_ptid (ptid=...) at gdb/regcache.c:612
 #3  0x000000000064cca1 in target_resume (ptid=..., step=1, signal=GDB_SIGNAL_0) at gdb/target.c:2136
 #4  0x00000000005f57af in resume (step=1, sig=GDB_SIGNAL_0) at gdb/infrun.c:2263
 #5  0x00000000005f6051 in proceed (addr=18446744073709551615, siggnal=GDB_SIGNAL_DEFAULT, step=1) at gdb/infrun.c:2613

And then once we hide the prompt and remove readline's input handler
callback, we're in a bad state.  We end up with the target running
supposedly in the foreground, but with stdin still installed on the
event loop.  Any input then calls into readline, which aborts because
no rl_linefunc callback handler is installed:

 Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
 0x0000003b36a35877 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:56
 56        return INLINE_SYSCALL (tgkill, 3, pid, selftid, sig);

 (top-gdb) bt
 #0  0x0000003b36a35877 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:56
 #1  0x0000003b36a36f68 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:89
 During symbol reading, debug info gives source 9 included from file at zero line 0.
 During symbol reading, debug info gives command-line macro definition with non-zero line 19: _STDC_PREDEF_H 1.
 #2  0x0000000000784a25 in rl_callback_read_char () at src/readline/callback.c:116
 #3  0x0000000000619111 in rl_callback_read_char_wrapper (client_data=0x0) at src/gdb/event-top.c:167
 #4  0x00000000006194e7 in stdin_event_handler (error=0, client_data=0x0) at src/gdb/event-top.c:373
 #5  0x00000000006180da in handle_file_event (data=...) at src/gdb/event-loop.c:763
 #6  0x00000000006175c1 in process_event () at src/gdb/event-loop.c:340
 #7  0x0000000000617688 in gdb_do_one_event () at src/gdb/event-loop.c:404
 #8  0x00000000006176d8 in start_event_loop () at src/gdb/event-loop.c:429
 #9  0x0000000000619143 in cli_command_loop (data=0x0) at src/gdb/event-top.c:182
 #10 0x000000000060f4c8 in current_interp_command_loop () at src/gdb/interps.c:318
 #11 0x0000000000610691 in captured_command_loop (data=0x0) at src/gdb/main.c:323
 #12 0x000000000060c385 in catch_errors (func=0x610676 <captured_command_loop>, func_args=0x0, errstring=0x900241 "", mask=RETURN_MASK_ALL)
     at src/gdb/exceptions.c:237
 #13 0x0000000000611b8f in captured_main (data=0x7fffffffd7b0) at src/gdb/main.c:1151
 #14 0x000000000060c385 in catch_errors (func=0x610a8e <captured_main>, func_args=0x7fffffffd7b0, errstring=0x900241 "", mask=RETURN_MASK_ALL)
     at src/gdb/exceptions.c:237
 #15 0x0000000000611bb8 in gdb_main (args=0x7fffffffd7b0) at src/gdb/main.c:1159
 #16 0x000000000045ef57 in main (argc=3, argv=0x7fffffffd8b8) at src/gdb/gdb.c:32

The fix is to make the annotation code call target_terminal_inferior
again after printing, if the inferior's settings were in effect.

While at it, when we're doing output only, instead of
target_terminal_ours, we should call target_terminal_ours_for_output.
The latter doesn't actually remove stdin from the event loop, and also
leaves SIGINT forwarded to the target.

New test included.

Tested on x86_64 Fedora 20, native and gdbserver.

gdb/
2014-10-17  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

	PR gdb/17472
	* annotate.c (annotate_breakpoints_invalid): Use
	target_terminal_our_for_output instead of target_terminal_ours.
	Give back the terminal to the target.
	(annotate_frames_invalid): Likewise.

gdb/testsuite/
2014-10-17  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

	PR gdb/17472
	* gdb.base/annota-input-while-running.c: New file.
	* gdb.base/annota-input-while-running.exp: New file.
PR gdb/17300: Input after "c -a" crashes readline/GDB

If all threads in the target were already running when the user does
"c -a", nothing puts the inferior's terminal settings in effect and
removes stdin from the event loop, which we must when running a
foreground command.  The result is that user input afterwards crashes
readline/gdb:

 (gdb) start
 Temporary breakpoint 1 at 0x4005d4: file continue-all-already-running.c, line 23.
 Starting program: continue-all-already-running

 Temporary breakpoint 1, main () at continue-all-already-running.c:23
 23        sleep (10);
 (gdb) c -a&
 Continuing.
 (gdb) c -a
 Continuing.
 p 1
 readline: readline_callback_read_char() called with no handler!
 Aborted (core dumped)
 $

Backtrace:

 Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
 0x0000003b36a35877 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:56
 56        return INLINE_SYSCALL (tgkill, 3, pid, selftid, sig);
 (top-gdb) p 1
 $1 = 1
 (top-gdb) bt
 #0  0x0000003b36a35877 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:56
 #1  0x0000003b36a36f68 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:89
 #2  0x0000000000784aa9 in rl_callback_read_char () at readline/callback.c:116
 #3  0x0000000000619181 in rl_callback_read_char_wrapper (client_data=0x0) at gdb/event-top.c:167
 #4  0x0000000000619557 in stdin_event_handler (error=0, client_data=0x0) at gdb/event-top.c:373
 #5  0x000000000061814a in handle_file_event (data=...) at gdb/event-loop.c:763
 #6  0x0000000000617631 in process_event () at gdb/event-loop.c:340
 #7  0x00000000006176f8 in gdb_do_one_event () at gdb/event-loop.c:404
 #8  0x0000000000617748 in start_event_loop () at gdb/event-loop.c:429
 #9  0x00000000006191b3 in cli_command_loop (data=0x0) at gdb/event-top.c:182
 #10 0x000000000060f538 in current_interp_command_loop () at gdb/interps.c:318
 #11 0x0000000000610701 in captured_command_loop (data=0x0) at gdb/main.c:323
 #12 0x000000000060c3f5 in catch_errors (func=0x6106e6 <captured_command_loop>, func_args=0x0, errstring=0x9002c1 "", mask=RETURN_MASK_ALL)
     at gdb/exceptions.c:237
 #13 0x0000000000611bff in captured_main (data=0x7fffffffd780) at gdb/main.c:1151
 #14 0x000000000060c3f5 in catch_errors (func=0x610afe <captured_main>, func_args=0x7fffffffd780, errstring=0x9002c1 "", mask=RETURN_MASK_ALL)
     at gdb/exceptions.c:237
 #15 0x0000000000611c28 in gdb_main (args=0x7fffffffd780) at gdb/main.c:1159
 #16 0x000000000045ef97 in main (argc=5, argv=0x7fffffffd888) at gdb/gdb.c:32
 (top-gdb)

Tested on x86_64 Fedora 20, native and gdbserver.

gdb/
2014-10-17  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

	PR gdb/17300
	* infcmd.c (continue_1): If continuing all threads in the
	foreground, make sure the inferior's terminal settings are put in
	effect.

gdb/testsuite/
2014-10-17  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

	PR gdb/17300
	* gdb.base/continue-all-already-running.c: New file.
	* gdb.base/continue-all-already-running.exp: New file.
PR gdb/17471: Repeating a background command makes it foreground

When we repeat a command, by just pressing <ret>, the input from the
previous command is reused for the new command invocation.

When an execution command strips the "&" out of its incoming argument
string, to detect background execution, we poke a '\0' directly to the
incoming argument string.

Combine both, and a repeat of a background command loses the "&".

This is actually only visible if args other than "&" are specified
(e.g., "c 1&" or "next 2&" or "c -a&"), as in the special case of "&"
alone (e.g. "c&") doesn't actually clobber the incoming string.

Fix this by making strip_bg_char return a new string instead of poking
a hole in the input string.

New test included.

Tested on x86_64 Fedora 20, native and gdbserver.

gdb/
2014-10-17  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

	PR gdb/17471
	* infcmd.c (strip_bg_char): Change prototype and rewrite.  Now
	returns a copy of the input.
	(run_command_1, continue_command, step_1, jump_command)
	(signal_command, until_command, advance_command, finish_command)
	(attach_command): Adjust and install a cleanup to free the
	stripped args.

gdb/testsuite/
2014-10-17  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

	PR gdb/17471
	* gdb.base/bg-execution-repeat.c: New file.
	* gdb.base/bg-execution-repeat.exp: New file.
Automatic date update in version.in
Merge remote-tracking branch 'gnu/gdb-7.8-branch' into 7.8