ARM: mm: lazy cache flushing on non-mapped pages

Currently flush_dcache_page() thinks pages as non-mapped if
mapping_mapped(mapping) return false. This approach is very
coase:
	- mmap on part of file may cause all pages backed on
	the file being thought as mmaped

	- file-backed pages aren't mapped into user space actually
	if the memory mmaped on the file isn't accessed

This patch uses page_mapped() to decide if the page has been
mapped.

>From the attached test code, I find there is much performance
improvement(>25%) when accessing page caches via read under this
situations, so memcpy benefits a lot from not flushing cache
under this situation.

No.   read time without the patch	No. read time with the patch
================================================================
No. 0, time  22615636 us		No. 0, time  22014717 us
No. 1, time  4387851 us 		No. 1, time  3113184 us
No. 2, time  4276535 us 		No. 2, time  3005244 us
No. 3, time  4259821 us 		No. 3, time  3001565 us
No. 4, time  4263811 us 		No. 4, time  3002748 us
No. 5, time  4258486 us 		No. 5, time  3004104 us
No. 6, time  4253009 us 		No. 6, time  3002188 us
No. 7, time  4262809 us 		No. 7, time  2998196 us
No. 8, time  4264525 us 		No. 8, time  3007255 us
No. 9, time  4267795 us 		No. 9, time  3005094 us

1), No.0. is to read the file from storage device, and others are
to read the file from page caches basically.
2), file size is 512M, and is on ext4 over usb mass storage.
3), the test is done on Pandaboard.

unsigned int  sum = 0;
unsigned long sum_val = 0;

static unsigned long tv_diff(struct timeval *tv1, struct timeval *tv2)
{
	return (tv2->tv_sec - tv1->tv_sec) * 1000000 +
		(tv2->tv_usec - tv1->tv_usec);
}

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
	char *mbuf, fbuf;
	int fd;
	int i;
	unsigned long page_size, size;
	struct stat stat;
	struct timeval t1, t2;
	unsigned char *rbuf = malloc(32 * page_size);

	if (!rbuf) {
		printf("	%s\n", "malloc failed");
		exit(-1);
	}

	page_size = getpagesize();
	fd = open(argv[1], O_RDWR);
	assert(fd >= 0);

	fstat(fd, &stat);
	size = stat.st_size;
	printf("%s: file %s, size %lu, page size %lu\n",
		argv[0],
		argv[1], size, page_size);

	gettimeofday(&t1, NULL);
	mbuf = mmap(NULL, size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
	if (!mbuf) {
		printf("	%s\n", "mmap failed");
		exit(-1);
	}

	for (i = 0 ; i < size ; i += (page_size * 32)) {
		int rcnt;
		lseek(fd, i, SEEK_SET);
		rcnt = read(fd, rbuf, page_size * 32);
		if (rcnt != page_size * 32) {
			printf("%s: read faild\n", __func__);
			exit(-1);
		}
	}
	free(rbuf);
	munmap(mbuf, size);
	gettimeofday(&t2, NULL);
	printf("\tread mmaped time: %luus\n", tv_diff(&t1, &t2));

	close(fd);
}

Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken at google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre at linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux at arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei at canonical.com>
ARM: rwlocks: remove unused branch labels from trylock routines

The ARM arch_{read,write}_trylock implementations include unused
backwards branch labels, since we don't retry the locking operation
if the exclusive store fails.

This patch removes the labels.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
ARM: spinlock: use ticket algorithm for ARMv6+ locking implementation

Ticket spinlocks ensure locking fairness by reducing the thundering herd
effect when acquiring a lock. This is especially important on systems
where memory-access times are not necessarily uniform when accessing
the lock structure (for example, on a multi-cluster platform where the
lock is allocated into L1 when a CPU releases it).

This patch implements the ticket spinlock algorithm for ARM, replacing
the simpler implementation for ARMv6+ processors.

Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico at fluxnic.net>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
ARM: 7467/1: mutex: use generic xchg-based implementation for ARMv6+

The open-coded mutex implementation for ARMv6+ cores suffers from a
severe lack of barriers, so in the uncontended case we don't actually
protect any accesses performed during the critical section.

Furthermore, the code is largely a duplication of the ARMv6+ atomic_dec
code but optimised to remove a branch instruction, as the mutex fastpath
was previously inlined. Now that this is executed out-of-line, we can
reuse the atomic access code for the locking (in fact, we use the xchg
code as this produces shorter critical sections).

This patch uses the generic xchg based implementation for mutexes on
ARMv6+, which introduces barriers to the lock/unlock operations and also
has the benefit of removing a fair amount of inline assembly code.

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Reported-by: Shan Kang <kangshan0910@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
mutex: place lock in contended state after fastpath_lock failure

ARM recently moved to asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h for its mutex
implementation after the previous implementation was found to be missing
some crucial memory barriers. However, this has revealed some problems
running hackbench on SMP platforms due to the way in which the
MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER code operates.

The symptoms are that a bunch of hackbench tasks are left waiting on an
unlocked mutex and therefore never get woken up to claim it. This boils
down to the following sequence of events:

        Task A        Task B        Task C        Lock value
0                                                     1
1       lock()                                        0
2                     lock()                          0
3                     spin(A)                         0
4       unlock()                                      1
5                                   lock()            0
6                     cmpxchg(1,0)                    0
7                     contended()                    -1
8       lock()                                        0
9       spin(C)                                       0
10                                  unlock()          1
11      cmpxchg(1,0)                                  0
12      unlock()                                      1

At this point, the lock is unlocked, but Task B is in an uninterruptible
sleep with nobody to wake it up.

This patch fixes the problem by ensuring we put the lock into the
contended state if we fail to acquire it on the fastpath, ensuring that
any blocked waiters are woken up when the mutex is released.

Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
sched: Fix select_fallback_rq() vs cpu_active/cpu_online

Commit 5fbd036b55 ("sched: Cleanup cpu_active madness"), which was
supposed to finally sort the cpu_active mess, instead uncovered more.

Since CPU_STARTING is ran before setting the cpu online, there's a
(small) window where the cpu has active,!online.

If during this time there's a wakeup of a task that used to reside on
that cpu select_task_rq() will use select_fallback_rq() to compute an
alternative cpu to run on since we find !online.

select_fallback_rq() however will compute the new cpu against
cpu_active, this means that it can return the same cpu it started out
with, the !online one, since that cpu is in fact marked active.

This results in us trying to scheduling a task on an offline cpu and
triggering a WARN in the IPI code.

The solution proposed by Chuansheng Liu of setting cpu_active in
set_cpu_online() is buggy, firstly not all archs actually use
set_cpu_online(), secondly, not all archs call set_cpu_online() with
IRQs disabled, this means we would introduce either the same race or
the race from fd8a7de17 ("x86: cpu-hotplug: Prevent softirq wakeup on
wrong CPU") -- albeit much narrower.

[ By setting online first and active later we have a window of
  online,!active, fresh and bound kthreads have task_cpu() of 0 and
  since cpu0 isn't in tsk_cpus_allowed() we end up in
  select_fallback_rq() which excludes !active, resulting in a reset
  of ->cpus_allowed and the thread running all over the place. ]

The solution is to re-work select_fallback_rq() to require active
_and_ online. This makes the active,!online case work as expected,
OTOH archs running CPU_STARTING after setting online are now
vulnerable to the issue from fd8a7de17 -- these are alpha and
blackfin.

Change-Id: I34bedb461f77bfe4af78ef5ddd3fb3a230ca3551
Reported-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-hubqk1i10o4dpvlm06gq7v6j@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Taras Kondratiuk <taras@ti.com>
ARM: SMP: use a timing out completion for cpu hotplug

Rather than open-coding the jiffy-based wait, and polling for the
secondary CPU to come online, use a completion instead.  This
removes the need to poll, instead we will be notified when the
secondary CPU has initialized.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
ARM: 6998/2: kernel: use proper memory barriers for bitops

Improve scalability by avoiding costly and unnecessary L2 cache sync
in handling bitops.

Change-Id: If6b9f52edbb597e3298227a13ed4e6edc629bf11
Signed-off-by: Heechul Yun <hyun@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Maulik Mankad <maulik@ti.com>
sched: Cleanup cpu_active madness

Stepan found:

CPU0		CPUn

_cpu_up()
  __cpu_up()

		boostrap()
		  notify_cpu_starting()
		  set_cpu_online()
		  while (!cpu_active())
		    cpu_relax()

<PREEMPT-out>

smp_call_function(.wait=1)
  /* we find cpu_online() is true */
  arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask()

  /* wait-forever-more */

<PREEMPT-in>
		  local_irq_enable()

  cpu_notify(CPU_ONLINE)
    sched_cpu_active()
      set_cpu_active()

Now the purpose of cpu_active is mostly with bringing down a cpu, where
we mark it !active to avoid the load-balancer from moving tasks to it
while we tear down the cpu. This is required because we only update the
sched_domain tree after we brought the cpu-down. And this is needed so
that some tasks can still run while we bring it down, we just don't want
new tasks to appear.

On cpu-up however the sched_domain tree doesn't yet include the new cpu,
so its invisible to the load-balancer, regardless of the active state.
So instead of setting the active state after we boot the new cpu (and
consequently having to wait for it before enabling interrupts) set the
cpu active before we set it online and avoid the whole mess.

Reported-by: Stepan Moskovchenko <stepanm@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1323965362.18942.71.camel@twins
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
OMAP: dmtimer: Fix memory leak on dmtimer error

Change-Id: I858c24a21410f2c1c85b1b8b2c1fc4dc5d3c1e6d
Signed-off-by: Jared Suttles <jsuttles@motorola.com>