qseecom:  Add SFAB clock voting.

Add SFAB voting in  QSEECOM_IOCTL_PERF_ENABLE_REQ.
The SFAB clock needs to be bumped up to its optimal
value when opearting in high bandwidth mode (for max
crypto performance)

Signed-off-by: Mona Hossain <mhossain@codeaurora.org>
(cherry picked from commit 8e2d73a0ade94ffd27882043d562c7ee825d9f7c)

Conflicts:

	drivers/misc/qseecom.c

Change-Id: I281e544756304f19969afbab7196a227dad0e2b1
Signed-off-by: Sudhir Sharma <sudsha@codeaurora.org>
msm: memutils: memcpy, memmove, copy_page optimization
Preload farther to take advantage of the memory bus, and assume
64-byte cache lines.  Unroll some pairs of ldm/stm as well, for
unexplainable reasons.

Future enhancements should include,

- #define for how far to preload, possibly defined separately for
  memcpy, copy_*_user
- Tuning for misaligned buffers
- Tuning for memmove
- Tuning for small buffers
- Understanding mechanism behind ldm/stm unroll causing some gains
  in copy_to_user

BASELINE (msm8960pro):
======================================================================
memcpy 1000MB at 5MB       : took 808850 usec, bandwidth 1236.236 MB/s
copy_to_user 1000MB at 5MB : took 810071 usec, bandwidth 1234.234 MB/s
copy_from_user 1000MB at 5M: took 942926 usec, bandwidth 1060.060 MB/s
memmove 1000GB at 5MB      : took 848588 usec, bandwidth 1178.178 MB/s
copy_to_user 1000GB at 4kB : took 847916 usec, bandwidth 1179.179 MB/s
copy_from_user 1000GB at 4k: took 935113 usec, bandwidth 1069.069 MB/s
copy_page 1000GB at 4kB    : took 779459 usec, bandwidth 1282.282 MB/s

THIS PATCH:
======================================================================
memcpy 1000MB at 5MB       : took 346223 usec, bandwidth 2888.888 MB/s
copy_to_user 1000MB at 5MB : took 348084 usec, bandwidth 2872.872 MB/s
copy_from_user 1000MB at 5M: took 348176 usec, bandwidth 2872.872 MB/s
memmove 1000GB at 5MB      : took 348267 usec, bandwidth 2871.871 MB/s
copy_to_user 1000GB at 4kB : took 377018 usec, bandwidth 2652.652 MB/s
copy_from_user 1000GB at 4k: took 371829 usec, bandwidth 2689.689 MB/s
copy_page 1000GB at 4kB    : took 383763 usec, bandwidth 2605.605 MB/s

Change-Id: I843fe77192d61ce35a81e75d76fc09f0a472e98a
Signed-off-by: Chris Fries <C.Fries@motorola.com>

Conflicts:
	arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig

Conflicts:
	arch/arm/lib/Makefile
	arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig
	arch/arm/mach-msm/Makefile
msm: memutils: memcpy, memmove optimization

1. To fit 8x26 64-bytes cache line size, we change preload steps as 64Bytes.
2. According to tune result, change preload distance as 5 cache lines.
3. According to tune result, re-arrange the ld/str order as back-to-back
   for copy_from_user.

The markable improvement:
	memcpy : 5%
	copy_to_user : 9%
	copy_from_user : 13%
	memmove : 37%

Raw data is as below:

BASELINE:
	memcpy 1000MB at 5MB       : took 1547098 usec, bandwidth 646.646 MB/s
	copy_to_user 1000MB at 5MB : took 1704308 usec, bandwidth 586.586 MB/s
	copy_from_user 1000MB at 5M: took 1777090 usec, bandwidth 562.562 MB/s
	memmove 1000GB at 5MB      : took 1066205 usec, bandwidth 937.937 MB/s
	copy_to_user 1000GB at 4kB : took 1774866 usec, bandwidth 563.563 MB/s
	copy_from_user 1000GB at 4k: took 1797654 usec, bandwidth 556.556 MB/s
	copy_page 1000GB at 4kB    : took 1644606 usec, bandwidth 608.608 MB/s
	memmove 1000GB at 4kB      : took 1236227 usec, bandwidth 808.808 MB/s

THIS PATCH:
	memcpy 1000MB at 5MB       : took 1475835 usec, bandwidth 677.677 MB/s
	copy_to_user 1000MB at 5MB : took 1559060 usec, bandwidth 641.641 MB/s
	copy_from_user 1000MB at 5M: took 1561603 usec, bandwidth 640.640 MB/s
	memmove 1000GB at 5MB      : took 861664 usec, bandwidth 1160.160 MB/s
	copy_to_user 1000GB at 4kB : took 1673501 usec, bandwidth 597.597 MB/s
	copy_from_user 1000GB at 4k: took 1674006 usec, bandwidth 597.597 MB/s
	copy_page 1000GB at 4kB    : took 1691358 usec, bandwidth 591.591 MB/s
	memmove 1000GB at 4kB      : took 882985 usec, bandwidth 1132.132 MB/s

Change-Id: I83bec3b7a9dd9cd88890eaa7ec423363e230a651
Signed-off-by: Hong-Mei Li <a21834@motorola.com>
Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.pcs.mot.com/550383
SLT-Approved: Slta Waiver <sltawvr@motorola.com>
Tested-by: Jira Key <jirakey@motorola.com>
Reviewed-by: Klocwork kwcheck <klocwork-kwcheck@sourceforge.mot.com>
Reviewed-by: Check Patch <CHEKPACH@motorola.com>
Reviewed-by: Yi-Wei Zhao <gbjc64@motorola.com>
Submit-Approved: Jira Key <jirakey@motorola.com>
[v4] binfmt_elf.c: use get_random_int() to fix entropy depleting
Entropy is quickly depleted under normal operations like ls(1), cat(1),
etc...  between 2.6.30 to current mainline, for instance:

$ cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail
3428
$ cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail
2911
$cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail
2620

We observed this problem has been occurring since 2.6.30 with
fs/binfmt_elf.c: create_elf_tables()->get_random_bytes(), introduced by
f06295b44c296c8f ("ELF: implement AT_RANDOM for glibc PRNG seeding").

/*
 * Generate 16 random bytes for userspace PRNG seeding.
 */
get_random_bytes(k_rand_bytes, sizeof(k_rand_bytes));

The patch introduces a wrapper around get_random_int() which has lower
overhead than calling get_random_bytes() directly.

With this patch applied:
$ cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail
2731
$ cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail
2802
$ cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail
2878

Analyzed by John Sobecki.

Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <aedilger@gmail.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnn@arndb.de>
Cc: John Sobecki <john.sobecki@oracle.com>
Cc: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>

Conflicts:
	fs/binfmt_elf.c
enable addition tcp cong algos
frandom

Signed-off-by: flar2 <asegaert@gmail.com>
enable mach memutils in defconfig