slimbus: initial overclocking of slimbus

Increase root freq from 11 (24.526MHz) to 31 max (27+MHz) which is the
largest it will take .Increase clock gear from 7 to 10 (max again)

This means SLIMbus will use its maximum potential to give the best audio
quality for the hardware. Takes advantage of both hardware and the mods
from zeroinfinity, also opening the door for more things that were
previously limited by this. Researched and experimented by ZeroInfinity
and Poondog

Signed-off-by: poondog <markj338@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
Revert bulk of string patches.

Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
PM / wakeup: Use irqsave/irqrestore for events_lock

Jon Medhurst (Tixy) recently noticed a problem with the
events_lock usage. One of the Android patches that uses
wakeup_sources calls wakeup_source_add() with irqs disabled.
However, the event_lock usage in wakeup_source_add() uses
spin_lock_irq()/spin_unlock_irq(), which reenables interrupts.
This results in lockdep warnings.

The fix is to use spin_lock_irqsave()/spin_lock_irqrestore()
instead for the events_lock.

References: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-landing-team-arm/+bug/1037565
Reported-and-debugged-by: Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <tixy@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
workqueue: perform cpu down operations from low priority cpu_notifier()

Currently, all workqueue cpu hotplug operations run off
CPU_PRI_WORKQUEUE which is higher than normal notifiers.  This is to
ensure that workqueue is up and running while bringing up a CPU before
other notifiers try to use workqueue on the CPU.

Per-cpu workqueues are supposed to remain working and bound to the CPU
for normal CPU_DOWN_PREPARE notifiers.  This holds mostly true even
with workqueue offlining running with higher priority because
workqueue CPU_DOWN_PREPARE only creates a bound trustee thread which
runs the per-cpu workqueue without concurrency management without
explicitly detaching the existing workers.

However, if the trustee needs to create new workers, it creates
unbound workers which may wander off to other CPUs while
CPU_DOWN_PREPARE notifiers are in progress.  Furthermore, if the CPU
down is cancelled, the per-CPU workqueue may end up with workers which
aren't bound to the CPU.

While reliably reproducible with a convoluted artificial test-case
involving scheduling and flushing CPU burning work items from CPU down
notifiers, this isn't very likely to happen in the wild, and, even
when it happens, the effects are likely to be hidden by the following
successful CPU down.

Fix it by using different priorities for up and down notifiers - high
priority for up operations and low priority for down operations.

Workqueue cpu hotplug operations will soon go through further cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>