[WIP] Client distributor

Maybe is better to say that the translator maps an endpoint address to a
logical group name of endpoints

On Tuesday, November 11, 2014, Andreas Öhlund <notifications@github.com>
wrote:

> In src/NServiceBus.Core/Unicast/Routing/IRouterDistributor.cs:
>
> > +{
> > +    using NServiceBus.Config;
> > +
> > +    /// <summary>
> > +    /// Base interface to implement to create different types of routing distributors.
> > +    /// </summary>
> > +    public interface IRouterDistributor
> > +    {
> > +        /// <summary>
> > +        /// Returns the full address to send messages to based on the <paramref name="queueName"/> provided.
> > +        /// If no routing distribution is available for the <paramref name="queueName"/>, the address specified in <see cref="UnicastBusConfig.MessageEndpointMappings"/> is used.
> > +        /// </summary>
> > +        /// <param name="queueName">The queue name the message is to be sent to.</param>
> > +        /// <param name="address">The full address to send to. (The address needs to be able to be parsable by <see cref="Address.Parse"/>)</param>
> > +        /// <returns><code>true</code> if route exists, otherwise <code>false</code>.</returns>
> > +        bool TryGetRouteAddress(string queueName, out string address);
>
> Still not convinced that only the queue name is appropriate here. Eg.
> azure has concepts of namespaces and rabbit virtual hosts, that info is in
> the address and as I see it could be relevant to determine how to route?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/Particular/NServiceBus/pull/2565/files#r20140351>.
>