Hi William,

Yes, it's intentional. RelEx only generates _det for definite article "the"
and "that/this/those/these/...", to specify the definite concepts from the
general concepts for the later stage's purpose..

--
Ruiting Lian


On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:27 PM, William Ma <notifications@github.com>wrote:

> In src/java/relex/output/LogicProcessor.java:
>
> > +		 */
> > +		public Boolean BinaryHeadCB(FeatureNode parentNode)
> > +		{
> > +			return ApplyToLink(parentNode, "links");
> > +		}
> > +		
> > +		/**
> > +		 * This method is not needed.
> > +		 */
> > +		public Boolean BinaryRelationCB(String relName,	FeatureNode srcNode, FeatureNode tgtNode)
> > +		{
> > +			return false;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		/**
> > +		 * This method is used for "sf-links", which is needed for Stanford-relations such as _det.
>
> I figured why I thought _det disappeared from the Feature Structure. In
> fact, it appears correctly for sentences such as "I ate those apples." for
> the word "those". However, for sentences such as "I ate an apple.", I used
> to get _det rules for the word "an" as well using sf-links. I suppose this
> is intentional.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/opencog/relex/pull/37/files#r12889519>
> .
>