optimzed SipHash implementation

work started from @gereeter's PR: https://github.com/mozilla/rust/pull/13114
but adjusted bits

```
before
test hash::sip::tests::bench_u64                            ... bench:        34 ns/iter (+/- 0)
test hash::sip::tests::bench_str_under_8_bytes              ... bench:        37 ns/iter (+/- 1)
test hash::sip::tests::bench_str_of_8_bytes                 ... bench:        43 ns/iter (+/- 1)
test hash::sip::tests::bench_str_over_8_bytes               ... bench:        50 ns/iter (+/- 1)
test hash::sip::tests::bench_long_str                       ... bench:       613 ns/iter (+/- 14)
test hash::sip::tests::bench_compound_1                     ... bench:       114 ns/iter (+/- 11)

after
test hash::sip::tests::bench_u64                            ... bench:        25 ns/iter (+/- 0)
test hash::sip::tests::bench_str_under_8_bytes              ... bench:        31 ns/iter (+/- 0)
test hash::sip::tests::bench_str_of_8_bytes                 ... bench:        36 ns/iter (+/- 0)
test hash::sip::tests::bench_str_over_8_bytes               ... bench:        40 ns/iter (+/- 0)
test hash::sip::tests::bench_long_str                       ... bench:       600 ns/iter (+/- 14)
test hash::sip::tests::bench_compound_1                     ... bench:        64 ns/iter (+/- 6)
```

Notably it seems smaller keys will hash faster. A long string doesn't see much gains, but compound cuts in half (once compound used a `int` and `u64`).