You mean non-canadian people is a different concept from non-(canadian
people) ?

yeah, definitely!

for example, a canadian dog is a non-(canadian person)

..


On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Sebastian Ruder <notifications@github.com>
wrote:

> In
> tests/python/test_pln/scm/relex2logic_pln_examples/contextual-inference-rwr.scm:
>
> > +            (ListLink
> > +                (VariableNode "$X")
> > +                (VariableNode "$Y")))))
> > +
> > +
> > +; 10) Non Canadian People involved with Canadian
> > +; people in the context of money have a chance of
> > +; being associated with log trafficking activities."
> > +(AverageLink (stv .6 .8)
> > +    (VariableNode "$X")
> > +    (ImplicationLink
> > +        (AndLink
> > +            (SubsetLink
> > +                (VariableNode "$X")
> > +                (NotLink
> > +                    (ConceptNode "CanadianPeople")))
>
> I agree with Cosmo here. These are different concepts. I think for this
> small universe, this is negligible, but in a bigger one PLN might come up
> with unsound inferences based on this discrepancy.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/opencog/opencog/pull/776/files#r13259897>.
>



-- 
Ben Goertzel, PhD
http://goertzel.org

"In an insane world, the sane man must appear to be insane". -- Capt. James
T. Kirk

"Emancipate yourself from mental slavery / None but ourselves can free our
minds" -- Robert Nesta Marley