Probably it could, but the current code definitely does not do so.

This was a bit off topic for this PR, I was just wondering whether the `jobName` could be replaced by an actual `Job` (or `TopLevelItem` etc.)—both callers of `getJobGroup` start off with a `Job` (potentially) so it seems silly to call `getName` (which only identifies jobs _within_ a folder, unlike `getFullName`) and then go back and try to find the job with that name.