fix issue #780 - Pass linker switches to gcc instead of to ld

This provides a fix for https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues/780

`ldc2` uses `gcc` for its linker, not `ld`.  Currently `ldc2` appends `-Xlinker` to linker switches (i.e. switches that begin with `-L`) so they bypass `gcc` and are passed directly to `ld`.  

In GCC, some options are passed transparently to `ld` (e.g. -lmylib), some are recognized only by `gcc` but not by `ld`, and some seem to have a different affect if passed to `gcc` than if passed to `ld`. (See https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Link-Options.html for a description of GCC's linker options).

By passing `ldc2`'s linker options directly to `ld`, it prevents users from leveraging options that are only recognized by `gcc` but affect the linking process, or options that have different effect in `gcc` than in `ld`.  Such switches include `-static`, `-nodefaultlibs` and `-nostdlib`. (There may be others).

This pull request modifies the way `ldc2` passes linker options to `gcc`.  It removes the `-Xlinker` prefix for any `ldc2` switch prefixed with `-L`.  If users still wish to bypass `gcc` and pass switches directly to `ld`, they can use `-L-Xlinker -L-ldswitch` in their `ldc2` command.

This change has the potential to break users' build scripts if they are depending on `ld`-specific options to be passed directly to `ld` using the `-L` prefix.  But, I think this is the best way forward, as it allows users to control all aspects of the linking process.  That is users can choose which options go to `gcc` and which options bypass `gcc` and go directly to `ld`.  Currently, users don't have this capability.

A pull request for this issue was submitted to DMD as well: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4140.  GDC, being GCC, does not suffer from this problem.